Transactions on Transport Sciences X:X | DOI: 10.5507/tots.2025.016
A mystery shopping survey tool to address the needs of vulnerable users at bus public transport stops
- School of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, GR-54124, Thessaloniki, Greece
The Quality-of-Service (QoS) criteria for public transport are not consistently met for all passengers, particularly vulnerable groups such as women, older adults, and people with disabilities. Women frequently travel for caregiving, carry heavy items, and travel with children, underscoring the need for improved accessibility conditions and customer care. Additionally, they face risks of assault and harassment, particularly in overcrowded environments, which have worsened during the COVID-19 pandemic. Older public transport users prioritize safety, accessibility, and comfort, with key concerns including easy access, comfortable seating, and little noise. Fear of falling and anxiety, exacerbated by factors like high steps and poor design, can discourage the use of public transport. People with disabilities encounter substantial obstacles when using public transport due to physical barriers, including narrow sidewalks and steep inclines that may increase the risk of falling. Common issues include inadequate shelters, poor lighting, and the inaccessibility of vehicles. Many individuals with disabilities prefer short waiting times at bus stops due to vulnerability, but they often experience bullying and stigma on public transport. Public transport is vital for achieving the UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Expanding public transport must meet the needs of vulnerable groups, including women, children, older adults, and persons with disabilities (Target 11.2). In this paper, we have highlighted the QoS factors that influence passenger waiting experiences at bus stops, which often significantly affect the choice of public transport as a travel option. We identified the QoS criteria pertinent to bus stops and outlined methods for evaluating quality based on established public transport standards. In accordance with the latest strategic objectives of the UN 2030 Agenda, which seeks to establish inclusive public transport that offers accessible and comfortable services for vulnerable users—including women, older adults, and individuals with disabilities—we associated each QoS factor at bus stops with specific quality assessment checks. Additionally, we created a mystery shopping survey instrument in the form of a structured checklist. This checklist comprises 15 categories of QoS evaluations and clear instructions for conducting pertinent audits by trained researchers. The design and content of the mystery shopping checklist make it a useful tool for assessing QoS at bus stops. It also enables the documented recognition of service shortcomings, facilitating the rational prioritization of investments to improve service quality in public transport, particularly for integrating vulnerable groups within the community.
Keywords: Quality of service; Sustainable Development Goal; Older adults; Women; People with disabilities
Received: February 20, 2025; Revised: May 25, 2025; Accepted: July 8, 2025; Prepublished online: July 29, 2025
References
- Abenoza, R.F., Ceccato, V., Susilo, Y.O., & Cats, O. (2018). Individual, travel, and bus stop characteristics influencing travelers' safety perceptions. Transportation Research Record 2672 (8), 19-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118758677
Go to original source...
- Alshalalfah, B., Shalaby, A. (2007). Case study: Relationship of walk access distance to transit with service, travel, and personal characteristics. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 133, pp. 114-118. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2007)133:2(114)
Go to original source...
- Blessing, G., & Natter, M. (2019). Do mystery shoppers really predict customer satisfaction and sales performance? Journal of Retailing, 95(3), 47-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2019.04.001
Go to original source...
- Campisi, T., Basbas, S., Al-Rashid, M. A., Tesoriere, G., & Georgiadis, G. (2021). A region-wide survey on emotional and psychological impacts of COVID-19 on public transport choices in Sicily, Italy. Transactions on Transport Science, 2, 1-10. DOI: 10.5507/tots.2021.010
Go to original source...
- Campisi, T., Georgiadis, G., & Basbas, S. (2022). Developing Cities for Citizens: Supporting Gender Equity for Successful and Sustainable Urban Mobility. In International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications (pp. 410-422). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10592-0_30
Go to original source...
- El-Geneidy, A.M., Tétreault, P.R., Suprenant-Legault, J. (2010). Pedestrian access to transit: identifying redundancies and gaps using a variable service area analysis. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies- 89th Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C.
- Fan, Y., Guthrie, A., & Levinson, D. (2016). Perception of Waiting Time at Transit Stops and Stations. Center for Transportation Studies - University of Minnesota,, Minneapolis, MN. http://www.cts.umn.edu/Publications/ResearchReports/reportdetail.html?id=2502.
- Georgiadis, G., Politis, I., Verani, E., Kopsacheilis, A., Sdoukopoulos, A., & Fyrogenis, I. (2025). Public transport travel time perception: A comparative study of passenger estimates and actual bus trip durations. Sustainable Futures, 9, 100590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100590
Go to original source...
- Georgiadis, G., Xenidis, Y., Toskas, I., & Papaioannou, P. (2014). A performance measurement system for public transport services in Thessaloniki, Greece. In Transport Research Arena (TRA) 5th Conference: Transport Solutions from Research to Deployment
- Kim, Y.K., Bartholomew, K., & Ewing, R. (2018). Impacts of Bus Stop Improvements. UT-18.04. Utah Department of Transportation - University of Utah Department of City & Metropolitan Planning. http://mrc.cap.utah.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2015/12/UT-18.04-Impacts-of-Bus-Stop-Improvements.pdf.
- Kopsacheilis, A., Politis, I., & Georgiadis, G. (2023). Assessment of bus speed influencing factors through the exploitation of machine learning techniques. Transportation Research Procedia, 69, 751-758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2023.02.232
Go to original source...
- Lagune-Reutler, M., Guthrie, A., Fan, Y., & Levinson, D. (2016). Transit stop environments and waiting time perception: impacts of trees, traffic exposure, and polluted air. Transportation Research Record 2543 (1), 82-90. https://doi.org/10.3141/2543-09
Go to original source...
- Li, H., Raeside, R., Chen, T., & McQuaid, R. W. (2012). Population ageing, gender and the transportation system. Research in Transportation Economics, 34(1), 39-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2011.12.007
Go to original source...
- Lu, A., Aievoli, S., Ackroyd, J., Carlin, C., & Reddy, A. (2009). Passenger Environment Survey: Representing the Customer Perspective in Quality Control. Transportation Research Record, 2112(1), 93-103. https://doi.org/10.3141/2112-12
Go to original source...
- Mattsson, J. (2012). Strategic insights from mystery shopping in B2B relationships. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 20, 313-322. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2012.657226
Go to original source...
- Maynard, A. (2009). Can measuring the benefits of accessible transport enable a seamless journey?. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 2(2), 21-30.
Go to original source...
- Moran, M. E. (2022). Are shelters in place? Mapping the distribution of transit amenities via a bus-stop census of San Francisco. Journal of Public Transportation, 24, 100023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubtr.2022.100023
Go to original source...
- Park, J., & Chowdhury, S. (2022). Towards an enabled journey: barriers encountered by public transport riders with disabilities for the whole journey chain. Transport Reviews, 42(2), 181-203. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2021.1955035
Go to original source...
- Šebová, Ľ., Marčeková, R., & Dušek, R. (2021). Mystery shopping a tool for sales processes evaluation in the hospitality facilities. Littera Scripta, 13, 82-94. https://doi.org/10.36708/littera_scripta2020/2/8
Go to original source...
- Sidorchuk, R., Efimova, D., Lopatinskaya, I., & Kaderova, V. (2015). Parametric approach to the assessment of service quality attributes of municipal passenger transport in Moscow. Modern Applied Science, 9(4), 303. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/mas.v9n4p303
Go to original source...
- Sogbe, E., Susilawati, S., & Pin, T. C. (2024). Scaling up public transport usage: a systematic literature review of service quality, satisfaction and attitude towards bus transport systems in developing countries. Public Transport, 1-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-024-00367-6
Go to original source...
- Sundling, C. (2015). Travel behavior change in older travelers: Understanding critical reactions to incidents encountered in public transport. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12(11), 14741-14763. doi: 10.3390/ijerph121114741
Go to original source...
- Tang, L., & Thakuriah, P. V. (2012). Ridership effects of real-time bus information system: A case study in the City of Chicago. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 22, 146-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2012.01.001
Go to original source...
- Tarantola, C., Vicard, P., & Ntzoufras, I. (2012). Monitoring and improving Greek banking services using Bayesian Networks: An analysis of mystery shopping data. Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 10103-10111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.02.060
Go to original source...
- Technical Committee CEN/TC 320: Transport-Logistics and services. (2001) Transportation - Logistics and services - Public passenger transport - Service quality definition, targeting and measurement. European Standard, European Committee for Standardization.
- The Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP). (1996). Report 19: Guidelines for the location and design of bus stops. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C.
- The Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP). (2013) Report 165: Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, Third Edition. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C.
- Tsioulianos, C., Basbas, S., & Georgiadis, G. (2020). How do passenger and trip attributes affect walking distances to bus public transport stops? Evidence from university students in Greece. Spatium, 44, 12-21. https://doi.org/10.2298/SPAT2044012T
Go to original source...
- UN-Habitat (2018). SDG Indicator 11.2.1 Training Module: Public Transport System. United Nations Human Settlement Programme (UN-Habitat), Nairobi.
- Union Internationale des Transports Publics (UITP). (2017) Urban public transport in the 21st century. Retrieved from: https://www.uitp.org/sites/default/files/cck-focus-papers files/UITP_Statistic%20Brief_national%20PT%20stats.pdf
- United Nations (UN) (2021). Sustainable transport, sustainable development. Interagency report for second Global Sustainable Transport Conference.
- Voß, S. & Ge, L. (2024). Mystery shopping: Improving quality assurance of public transport services for people with restricted mobility using a prototypical mobile application. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 2024 (HICSS-57). pp. 1618-1627, https://hdl.handle.net/10125/106581.
- Voß, S., Mejia, G., & Voß, A. (2020). Mystery shopping in public transport: the case of bus station design. In International conference on human-computer interaction (pp. 527-542). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60114-0_36
Go to original source...
- Watkins, K.E., Ferris, B., Borning, A., Rutherford, G.S., & Layton, D. (2011). Where is my bus? Impact of mobile real-time information on the perceived and actual wait time of transit riders. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 45(8), 839-848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2011.06.010
Go to original source...
- Wayland, S., Newland, J., Gill-Atkinson, L., Vaughan, C., Emerson, E., & Llewellyn, G. (2022). I had every right to be there: discriminatory acts towards young people with disabilities on public transport. Disability & Society, 37(2), 296-319. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2020.1822784
Go to original source...
- Wilson, A., & Gutmann, J. (1998). Public transport: The role of mystery shopping in investment decisions. Journal of the Market Research Society, 40(4), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/147078539804000401
Go to original source...
- Yaoyuneyong, G., Whaley, J., Butler, R., Williams, J. A., Jordan, K. L., & Hunt, L. B. (2018). Resort mystery shopping: A case study of hotel service. Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality & Tourism, 19, 358-386. https://doi.org/10.1080/1528008X.2017.1418702
Go to original source...
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.