Transactions on Transport Sciences 2025, 16(2):51-55 | DOI: 10.5507/tots.2025.013

Studying Near-miss Accidents instead of Crashes: Psychometric Characteristics of Near-miss Traffic Accidents Scale in Lithuanian Sample

Austėja Kiliutė, Goda Skinkytė, Tadas Vadvilavičius
Vytautas Magnus university, Kaunas, Lithuania

Purpose. Road traffic accidents (RTA) still are a major problem that causes health problems or death. However, it is difficult to study RTA since relatively small amount of them happen. For this reason, researchers turn to near-miss traffic accidents as construct that can be related to RTAs. Though near-miss traffic accidents are included in research, evidence about reliability and validity of measurement instruments are still lacking. Due to that this study aim: - to examine near-miss traffic accidents scale psychometric characteristics.

Method: This research involved two different age (young and middle-aged drivers and older drivers) drivers' groups. Young and middle-aged drivers' group consisted of 114 participants (50 males; age M = 27.08; SD = 9.66). Older drivers' group contained 260 drivers (144 males; M = 68.44; SD = 6.92). Participants had to complete Near-miss traffic accidents scale (Kurita et al., 2023; Makizaco et al., 2018), Driver Behavior questionnaire (DBQ) (Parker et al., 1995), questions about sociodemographic aspects and experience of real traffic accidents.

Results: This research showed that Near-miss traffic accidents scale was reliable in both drivers' groups. Confirmatory factor analysis suggested that scale has one factor and can be used to make valid comparisons between both drivers' groups. Results from older drivers' group confirmed that scale correlates with DBQ's errors and lapses subscales which shows scale's construct validity. However, results about scale relationship with age, gender and real traffic accidents experience are different in both drivers' groups.

Discussion: While some results in this study confirm Near-miss traffic accidents reliability and validity, other results do not allow to do reasonable conclusions about this instrument psychometric characteristics. It is crucial to continue investigating this scale in order to understand if results differences showing in this research are due to instrument flaws or methodological aspects of this study.

Keywords: Near-miss traffic accidents; errors and lapses; real traffic accidents; reliability; validity

Received: November 22, 2024; Revised: May 26, 2025; Accepted: June 3, 2025; Prepublished online: August 5, 2025; Published: September 15, 2025  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kiliutė, A., Skinkytė, G., & Vadvilavičius, T. (2025). Studying Near-miss Accidents instead of Crashes: Psychometric Characteristics of Near-miss Traffic Accidents Scale in Lithuanian Sample. Transactions on Transport Sciences, 16(2), 51-55. doi: 10.5507/tots.2025.013
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Balami, A. D., & Sambo, G. (2019). Road traffic accidents, near-misses and their associated factors among commercial tricycle drivers in a Nigerian city. Health and Environment, 1(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.25082/he.2019.01.001 Go to original source...
    2. Bekelcho, T., Birgoda, G. T., Leul, H., Maile, M., Alemayehu, M., & Olani, A. B. (2024). Near miss road traffic accidents and associated factors among truck drivers in Gamo zone, southern Ethiopia by using a contributory factors interaction model. Frontiers in Public Health, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1386521 Go to original source...
    3. De Winter, J., & Dodou, D. (2010). The Driver Behaviour Questionnaire as a predictor of accidents: a meta-analysis. Journal of Safety Research, 41(6), 463-470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2010.10.007 Go to original source...
    4. Diedenhofen, B., & Musch, J. (2016). Cocron: a web interface and R Package for the statistical comparison of Cronbach's Alpha Coefficients. International Journal of Internet Science, 11(1).
    5. Koppel, S., Stephens, A. N., Bédard, M., Charlton, J. L., Darzins, P., Di Stefano, M., Gagnon, S., Gélinas, I., Hua, P., MacLeay, L., Man-Son-Hing, M., Mazer, B., Myers, A., Naglie, G., Odell, M., Porter, M. M., Rapoport, M. J., Stinchcombe, A., Tuokko, H., . . . Marshall, S. (2018). Self-reported violations, errors and lapses for older drivers: Measuring the change in frequency of aberrant driving behaviours across five time-points. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 123, 132-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2018.11.009 Go to original source...
    6. Kurita, S., Doi, T., Harada, K., Katayama, O., Morikawa, M., Nishijima, C., Fujii, K., Misu, Y., Yamaguchi, R., Von Fingerhut, G., Kakita, D., & Shimada, H. (2023). Motoric cognitive risk syndrome and traffic incidents in older drivers in Japan. JAMA Network Open, 6(8), e2330475. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.30475 Go to original source...
    7. Kurita, S., Doi, T., Harada, K., Morikawa, M., Nishijima, C., Fujii, K., Kakita, D., & Shimada, H. (2024). Subjective memory concerns and car collisions: a cross-sectional cohort study among older Japanese drivers. Heliyon, 10(12), e33080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33080 Go to original source...
    8. Makizako, H., Shimada, H., Hotta, R., Doi, T., Tsutsumimoto, K., Nakakubo, S., & Makino, K. (2018). Associations of Near-Miss Traffic Incidents with Attention and Executive Function among Older Japanese Drivers. Gerontology, 64(5), 495-502. https://doi.org/10.1159/000486547 Go to original source...
    9. Parker, D., Reason, J., Manstead, A. S. R., & Stradling, S. G. (1995). Driving errors, driving violations and accident involvement. Ergonomics (London. Print), 38(5), 1036-1048. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139508925170 Go to original source...
    10. Ponterotto, J. G., & Ruckdeschel, D. E. (2007). An Overview of Coefficient Alpha and a Reliability Matrix for Estimating Adequacy of Internal Consistency Coefficients with Psychological Research Measures. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 105(3), 997-1014. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.105.3.997-1014 Go to original source...
    11. Powell, N. B., Schechtman, K. B., Riley, R. W., Guilleminault, C., Chiang, R. P., & Weaver, E. M. (2007). Sleepy driver Near-Misses may predict accident risks. SLEEP, 30(3), 331-342. https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/30.3.331 Go to original source...
    12. Putnick, D. L., & Bornstein, M. H. (2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review, 41, 71-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004 Go to original source...
    13. R Core Team (2024). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
    14. Rhodes, N., & Pivik, K. (2011). Age and gender differences in risky driving: The roles of positive affect and risk perception. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 43(3), 923-931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2010.11.015 Go to original source...
    15. Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1-36. http://www.jstatsoft.org/v48/i02/ Go to original source...
    16. RStudio Team (2024). RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio, PBC, Boston, MA URL http://www.rstudio.com/
    17. Stelmokienė, A., Endriulaitienė, A., Markąaitytė, R., Pranckevičienė, A., ©eibokaitė, L., & ®ardeckaitė-Matulaitienė, K. (2013). Lietuviąkos Vairuotojų elgesio klausimyno versijos psichometrinių rodiklių analizė. International Journal of Psychology: a Biopsychosocial Approach, 13(13), 139-158. https://doi.org/10.7220/1941-7233.13.7 Go to original source...
    18. Transporto kompetencijų agentūra. (2024). Eismo įvykių statistika Lietuvoje 2020 - 2023 m. [Traffic accident statictics in Lithuania 2020-2023]. https://tka.lt/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Eismo-ivykiu-statistika-Lietuvoje-2020-2023_compressed2.pdf
    19. World Health Organization [WHO]. (2023). Global status report on road safety 2023. https://www.who.int/teams/social-determinants-of-health/safety-and-mobility/global-status-report-on-road-safety-2023

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content