Transactions on Transport Sciences 2025, 16(1):44-49 | DOI: 10.5507/tots.2024.014

Is the Youth Aware of E-scooter Use Regulations? Evidence from the Region of Sicily

Tiziana Campisia, Socrates Basbasb, Andreas Nikiforiadisb, Thomas Papasb, Giovanni Tesorierea
a. Department of Engineering and Architecture, University of Enna KORE, Cittadella Universitaria 94100 Enna, Italy
b. School of Rural & Surveying Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece

Micromobility became a trend over the last few years in many European cities, but also worldwide. This trend emerged after the appearance of many e-scooter sharing services, which mainly operated in a dockless way, i.e. without fixed stations. Shared e-scooters were initially recognized as an ideal transport mode for first/last-mile trips, that could be perfectly combined with other modes and mainly public transport. However, the excessive use of shared e-scooters created also several issues in the cities. These issues are mainly associated with traffic safety and public space invasion. The main cause for these issues was that the cities were not adequately prepared for the appearance of this new transportation mode, and no appropriate regulations were established. Yet, this need has already led to the establishment of regulations in many European cities, including Italian ones. Despite the existence of regulations, it is still unclear if the users follow the rules, but also if the users are aware of the rules. In order to shed some light in this issue, a questionnaire survey was carried out in the region of Sicily. The survey focused on the youth, i.e. people aged between 18 and 26 years old. The selection of the specific age group was made because users of this age could be more vulnerable and disobedient, but also because the youth is the one that was mainly attracted by e-scooters based on previous studies. Finally, 302 responses were collected. Initial results show that some of the regulations are well known between the youth; yet, there are other regulations that are not clear yet. The results lay the foundation for forming appropriate campaigns for raising awareness among students and young adults regarding the micromobility regulations and the appropriate use of e-scooters in general. Such campaigns are considered essential for efficiently integrating micromobility in recent transportation systems.

Keywords: Micromobility; e-scooters; regulations; awareness

Received: February 2, 2024; Revised: July 27, 2024; Accepted: August 13, 2024; Prepublished online: November 19, 2024; Published: April 26, 2025  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Campisi, T., Basbas, S., Nikiforiadis, A., Papas, T., & Tesoriere, G. (2025). Is the Youth Aware of E-scooter Use Regulations? Evidence from the Region of Sicily. Transactions on Transport Sciences, 16(1), 44-49. doi: 10.5507/tots.2024.014
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Aaditya, B., & Rahul, T. M. (2021). Psychological impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on mode choice behavior: A hybrid choice modeling approach. Transport Policy, 108, 47-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.05.003 Go to original source...
    2. Abdelfattah, L., Deponte, D., & Fossa, G. (2022). The 15-minute city: Interpreting the model to bring out urban resiliencies. Transportation research procedia, 60, 330-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2021.12.043 Go to original source...
    3. Abdullah, M., Ali, N., Javid, M. A., Dias, C., & Campisi, T. (2021). Public transport versus solo travel mode choices during the COVID-19 pandemic: Self-reported evidence from a developing country. Transportation Engineering, 5, 100078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.treng.2021.100078 Go to original source...
    4. ACI (2022). https://www.aci.it/fileadmin/documenti/studi_e_ricerche/dati_statistiche/incidenti/2022/ACI-ISTAT_2022.pdf (accessed on February 2024)
    5. Badia, H., & Jenelius, E. (2023). Shared e-scooter micromobility: review of use patterns, perceptions and environmental impacts. Transport reviews, 43(5), 811-837. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2023.2171500 Go to original source...
    6. Basbas, S., Campisi, T., Papas, T., Trouva, M., & Tesoriere, G. (2023). The 15-Minute City Model: The Case of Sicily during and after COVID-19. COMMUNICATIONS, 25(2), A83-A92. https://doi.org/10.26552/com.C.2023.021 Go to original source...
    7. Basbas, S., Campisi, T., Tesoriere, G., Trouva, M., Papas, T., & Mrak, I. (2020). How to create walking-friendly cities. A multi-criteria analysis of the central open market area of Rijeka. Sustainability, 12(22), 9470. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229470 Go to original source...
    8. Brezovec, P., & Hampl, N. (2021). Electric vehicles ready for breakthrough in MaaS? consumer adoption of E-car sharing and E-scooter sharing as a part of mobility-as-a-service (MaaS). Energies, 14(4), 1088. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14041088 Go to original source...
    9. Caballini, C., Corazza, M. V., & Delponte, I. (2023). Turin, Rome and Genoa: comparison of the level of maturity of three large Italian cities towards Mobility as a Service. Transportation Research Procedia, 69, 163-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2023.02.158 Go to original source...
    10. Çakir, E. (2023). Neutrosophic Fuzzy Selected Element Reduction Approach (NF-SERA): Assessment of E-Scooter Parking Area. In 2023 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI) (pp. 1234-1238). IEEE. https://doi.org/ 10.1109/SSCI52147.2023.10371807 Go to original source...
    11. Campisi, T., Akgün, N., Ticali, D., & Tesoriere, G. (2020a). Exploring public opinion on personal mobility vehicle use: A case study in Palermo, Italy. Sustainability, 12(13), 5460. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135460 Go to original source...
    12. Campisi, T., Akgün-Tanbay, N., Md Nahiduzzaman, K., & Dissanayake, D. (2021a). Uptake of e-Scooters in Palermo, Italy: Do the Road Users Tend to Rent, Buy or Share?. In E.G. Nathanail, G. Adamos, & I. Karakikes (Eds.), Computational Science and Its Applications-ICCSA 2021: 21st International Conference (pp. 669-682). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86976-2_46 Go to original source...
    13. Campisi, T., Ali, N., Alemdar, K. D., Kaya, Ö., Çodur, M. Y., & Tesoriere, G. (2022a). Promotion of e-mobility and its main share market: Some considerations about e-shared mobility. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2611(1), 060002. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0119487 Go to original source...
    14. Campisi, T., Basbas, S., Al-Rashid, M. A., Tesoriere, G., & Georgiadis, G. (2021b). A region-wide survey on emotional and psychological impacts of COVID-19 on public transport choices in Sicily, Italy. Trans. Transp. Sci, 2, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.5507/tots.2021.010 Go to original source...
    15. Campisi, T., Basbas, S., Skoufas, A., Tesoriere, G., & Ticali, D. (2021c). Socio-eco-friendly performance of e-scooters in Palermo: preliminary statistical results. In Innovation in Urban and Regional Planning: Proceedings of the 11th INPUT Conference-Volume 1 (pp. 643-653). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68824-0_68 Go to original source...
    16. Campisi, T., Basbas, S., Tesoriere, G., Trouva, M., Papas, T., & Mrak, I. (2020b). How to create walking friendly cities. a multi-criteria analysis of the central open market area of rijeka. Sustainability, 12(22), 9470. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229470 Go to original source...
    17. Campisi, T., Basbas, S., Trouva, M., Papas, T., Akgün-Tanbay, N., Stamatiadis, N., & Tesoriere, G. (2022b). Anxiety, fear and stress feelings of road users during daily walking in COVID-19 pandemic: Sicilian cities. Transportation research procedia, 62, 107-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2022.02.014 Go to original source...
    18. Campisi, T., Skoufas, A., Kaltsidis, A., & Basbas, S. (2021d). Gender equality and E-scooters: Mind the gap! A statistical analysis of the Sicily Region, Italy. Social Sciences, 10(10), 403. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci10100403 Go to original source...
    19. Campisi, T., Tesoriere, G., Trouva, M., Papas, T., & Basbas, S. (2022c). Impact of teleworking on travel behavior during the COVID-19 era: the case of Sicily, Italy. Transportation Research Procedia, 60, 251-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2021.12.033 Go to original source...
    20. Carrese, S., Giacchetti, T., Nigro, M., Algeri, G., & Ceccarelli, G. (2021). Analysis and management of e-scooter sharing service in Italy. In 2021 7th International Conference on Models and Technologies for Intelligent Transportation Systems (MT-ITS) (pp. 1-7). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/MT-ITS49943.2021.9529274 Go to original source...
    21. Ciftci, K. Y., Michel, A., & Siegfried, P. (2022). Development of E-Mobility. In A. Michel & P. Siegfried (Eds.), The Potential Impact of E-Mobility on the Automotive Value Chain (pp. 23-33). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95599-1_3 Go to original source...
    22. Das, S., Boruah, A., Banerjee, A., Raoniar, R., Nama, S., & Maurya, A. K. (2021). Impact of COVID-19: A radical modal shift from public to private transport mode. Transport Policy, 109, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.05.005 Go to original source...
    23. Das, S., Hossain, A., Rahman, M. A., Sheykhfard, A., & Kutela, B. (2024). Case study on the traffic collision patterns of E-scooter riders. Transportation research record, 2678(4), 575-589. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981231185770 Go to original source...
    24. della Mura, M., Failla, S., Gori, N., Micucci, A., & Paganelli, F. (2022). E-Scooter Presence in Urban Areas: Are Consistent Rules, Paying Attention and Smooth Infrastructure Enough for Safety?. Sustainability, 14(21), 14303. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114303 Go to original source...
    25. Dias, G., Arsenio, E., & Ribeiro, P. (2021). The role of shared E-Scooter systems in urban sustainability and resilience during the COVID-19 mobility restrictions. Sustainability, 13(13), 7084. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137084 Go to original source...
    26. Elbaz, S., Richards, J. B., & Provost Savard, Y. (2022). Teleworking and work-life balance during the COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping review. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000330EVZ. https://www.evz.de/en/reisen-verkehr/e-mobilitaet/zweiraeder/e-scooter-regulations-in-europe.html (accessed on 1st June 2024) Go to original source...
    27. Fazio, M., Giuffrida, N., Le Pira, M., Inturri, G., & Ignaccolo, M. (2021). Planning suitable transport networks for e-scooters to foster micromobility spreading. Sustainability, 13(20), 11422. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011422 Go to original source...
    28. Fearnley, N. (2020). Micromobility-Regulatory challenges and opportunities. Shaping smart mobility futures: Governance and policy instruments in times of sustainability transitions, 169-186. Go to original source...
    29. Hemphill, R., MacArthur, J., Longenecker, P., Desai, G., Nie, L., Ibarra, A., & Dill, J. (2022). Congested sidewalks: The effects of the built environment on e-scooter parking compliance. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 15(1), 481-495. Go to original source...
    30. Hosseinzadeh, A., Algomaiah, M., Kluger, R., & Li, Z. (2021). E-scooters and sustainability: Investigating the relationship between the density of E-scooter trips and characteristics of sustainable urban development. Sustainable cities and society, 66, 102624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102624 Go to original source...
    31. ISTAT (2023) https://www.istat.it/comunicato-stampa/incidenti-stradali-in-italia-2023/#:~:text=Aumentano%20anche%20gli%20infortunati%20tra,(nel%202022%20erano%2016). (accessed on June 2024)
    32. Kostareli, A., Basbas, S., Stamatiadis, N., & Nikiforiadis, A. (2020). Attitudes of e-scooter non-users towards users. In E.G. Nathanail, G. Adamos, & I. Karakikes (Eds.), Advances in Mobility-as-a-Service Systems. CSUM 2020 (pp. 87-96). Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 1278. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61075-3_9 Go to original source...
    33. Kubik, A. (2022). Impact of the Use of Electric Scooters from Shared Mobility Systems on the Users. Smart Cities, 5(3), 1079-1091. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities5030054 Go to original source...
    34. Kwon, N., Chang, I., Lee, J., & Ahn, S. (2024). Analysis of E-scooter Risk Factors by Road Types on Different Speed Levels. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-024-1335-6 Go to original source...
    35. Myftiu, J., Gigliarano, C., Maggi, E., & Scagni, A. (2024). University commuting during the COVID-19 pandemic: Changes in travel behaviour and mode preferences. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 53, 101091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2023.101091 Go to original source...
    36. Nikiforiadis, A., Cobian Martin, I., Salanova Grau, J.M., Ayfantopoulou, G., Basbas, S. (2023a). Geofencing and city dashboards for micromobility: Identifying the needs of cities, operators and technology providers. Transportation Research Procedia, 69C, 663-670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2023.02.221 Go to original source...
    37. Nikiforiadis, A., Paschalidis, E., Stamatiadis, N., Paloka, N., Tsekoura, E., & Basbas, S. (2023b). E-scooters and other mode trip chaining: Preferences and attitudes of university students. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 170, 103636. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2023.103636 Go to original source...
    38. Nikiforiadis, A., Paschalidis, E., Stamatiadis, N., Raptopoulou, A., Kostareli, A., & Basbas, S. (2021). Analysis of attitudes and engagement of shared e-scooter users. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 94, 102790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102790 Go to original source...
    39. Papas, T., Basbas, S., & Campisi, T. (2023). Urban mobility evolution and the 15-minute city model: from holistic to bottom-up approach. Transportation research procedia, 69, 544-551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2023.02.206 Go to original source...
    40. Popova, Y., & Zagulova, D. (2022). Aspects of E-Scooter Sharing in the Smart City. Informatics, 9(2), 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics9020036 Go to original source...
    41. Raptopoulou, A., Basbas, S., Stamatiadis, N., Nikiforiadis, A. (2020). A first look at e-scooter users. In E.G. Nathanail, G. Adamos, & I. Karakikes (Eds.), Advances in Mobility-asa-Service Systems. CSUM 2020 (pp. 882-891). Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 1278. https://10.1007/978-3-030-61075-3_85 Go to original source...
    42. Ramadevi, N., & Balamurugan, C. R. (2022). E-Mobility-the future of the transportation sector in smart city-A review. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2452(1), 040001. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0113903 Go to original source...
    43. Silva, C. M., Santo, B. E., & Ferreira, L. T. (2022). The integration of E-Mobility in smart cities: the Portuguese scenario for EV charging in street light circuits. CIRED Porto Workshop 2022: E-mobility and power distribution systems, 2022, 472-475. https://doi.org/10.1049/icp.2022.0751 Go to original source...
    44. Weschke, J., Oostendorp, R., & Hardinghaus, M. (2022). Mode shift, motivational reasons, and impact on emissions of shared e-scooter usage. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 112, 103468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103468 Go to original source...
    45. Yao, W., Yu, J., Yang, Y., Chen, N., Jin, S., Hu, Y., & Bai, C. (2022). Understanding travel behavior adjustment under COVID-19. Communications in Transportation Research, 2, 100068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commtr.2022.100068 Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content