Transactions on Transport Sciences 2024, 15(3):12-17 | DOI: 10.5507/tots.2024.010

Exploratory Analysis of Hazard Factors Influencing the Safety Rating of Pedestrian Bridge

Ashar Ahmeda, Bushra Aijazb, Khawaja Huzaifa Ahmedb
a. NED University of Engineering and Technology, Karachi 75270, Pakistan
b. Independant Researcher, Karachi 75290, Pakistan

The proliferation of signal-free corridors in Karachi, Pakistan, has necessitated the construction of foot-over bridges to facilitate pedestrian road crossings. However, these structures have gradually deteriorated due to vandalism and social factors. Pedestrians perceive them as unsafe primarily due to their poor physical condition, including the absence of guardrails, and the presence of social hazards such as beggars, addicts, and stray dogs. This study aims to assess the safety rating of a foot-over bridge by pedestrians, considering various physical and social hazard factors. An in-person questionnaire-based survey was conducted at a foot-over bridge located near a major university in Karachi. Pedestrians were asked to rate the bridge's safety as safe or unsafe based on the factors they considered most hazardous while crossing it. These factors included the absence of guardrails, and the presence of beggars, addicts, and stray dogs. Pedestrians were also queried about the optimal time for crossing the bridge (morning, evening, or afternoon). Their age was recorded. A Binary Logistic Regression (BLR) model was developed to analyze the data, and odds ratios were calculated for each hazard factor. The results of the BLR model revealed that the gender of the pedestrian significantly influenced the safety rating of the bridge compared to other variables. Female pedestrians were five times more likely to rate the bridge as unsafe compared to males. Furthermore, younger pedestrians were 0.39 times more likely to perceive the bridge as unsafe compared to older ones. The absence of guardrails increased the likelihood of rating the bridge as unsafe by 1.1 times compared to other hazards, and pedestrians crossing the bridge during the afternoon were 1.7 times more likely to perceive it as unsafe compared to morning or evening crossings. In conclusion, female pedestrians perceive foot-over bridges in Karachi as more unsafe, with the absence of guardrails being identified as the primary physical hazard. These findings underscore the importance of addressing safety concerns and improving infrastructure to enhance pedestrian safety in urban environments. It is recommended that the guard rails of pedestrian bridges should be constructed with recycled sustainable materials to prevent them from theft and improve safety, thus, creating a more resilient infrastructure.

Keywords: Foot-over bridge; Hazard factors; Logistic regression; Odds ratio; Pedestrian

Received: November 29, 2023; Revised: May 4, 2024; Accepted: June 4, 2024; Prepublished online: August 2, 2024; Published: December 1, 2024  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Ahmed, A., Aijaz, B., & Ahmed, K.H. (2024). Exploratory Analysis of Hazard Factors Influencing the Safety Rating of Pedestrian Bridge. Transactions on Transport Sciences15(3), 12-17. doi: 10.5507/tots.2024.010
Download citation

References

  1. Ali, S. A. (2021, March 05). The Terrible Tale of Karachi's Pedestrian Bridges. Retrieved March 05, 2021, from The Express Tribune: https://tribune.com.pk/story/2287623/the-terrible-tale-of-karachis-pedestrian-bridges
  2. Allos, A. E., & Mohammad, A. R. (1983, 05). USAGE OF PEDESTRIAN FOOTBRIDGES. Traffic Engineering & Control, 24(5), 269-273.
  3. Banerjee, A., & Maurya, A. K. (2020). A comparative study of pedestrian movement behavior over foot over bridges under similar land-use type. Transportation Research Procedia, 48, 3342-3354. doi:10.1016/j.trpro.2020.08.119 Go to original source...
  4. Demiroz, Y., Onelcin, P., & Alver, Y. (2015). Illegal road crossing behavior of pedestrians at overpass locations: Factors affecting gap acceptance, crossing times and overpass use. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 80, 220-228. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2015.04.018 Go to original source...
  5. Evans, D. a. (1998). Understanding pedestrians' road crossing decisions: an application of the theory of planned behaviour. Health education research, 13(4), 481-489. doi:10.1093/her/13.4.481-a Go to original source...
  6. Hasan, R., Oviedo-Trespalacios, O., & Napiah, M. (2020). An intercept study of footbridge users and non-users in Malaysia. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 73, 66-79. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2020.05.011 Go to original source...
  7. Hess, M. D. (2019). Modelling pedestrian crossing choice on Cape Town's freeways: Caught between a rock and a hard place? Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 60, 245-261. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2018.10.005 Go to original source...
  8. Hosmer, D., & Lemeshow, S. (2000). Applied Logistic Regression (2nd ed., Vol. 354). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. doi:10.1002/0471722146 Go to original source...
  9. Kummeneje, A.-M., & Rundmo, T. (2019). Risk perception, worry, and pedestrian behaviour in the Norwegian population. Accident; analysis and prevention, 133, 105294. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2019.105294 Go to original source...
  10. Landa-Blanco, M., & Ávila, J. (2020). Factors related to the use of pedestrian bridges in university students of Honduras. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 71, 220-228. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2020.04.016 Go to original source...
  11. Mohammed, K. S. (2018). Analysis of illegal pedestrian crossing behavior on a major divided arterial road. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 54, 124-137. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2018.01.012 Go to original source...
  12. Moore, R. L. (1953). Pedestrian Choice and Judgment. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 4(1), 3-10. Go to original source...
  13. Moore, R. L. (1965). Pedestrian & motor vehicles are compatible in today's world. Traffic engineering.
  14. Mukherjee, D., & Mitra, S. (2022). What affects pedestrian crossing difficulty at urban intersections in a developing country? IATSS Research, 46(4), 586-601. doi:10.1016/j.iatssr.2022.10.002 Go to original source...
  15. Mutto, M., Kobusingye, O., & Lett, R. (2003, 01). The effect of an overpass on pedestrian injuries on a major highway in Kampala - Uganda. African health sciences, 2, 89-93.
  16. Onelcin, Y. A. (2018). Gap acceptance of pedestrians at overpass locations. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 56, 436-443. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2018.05.010 Go to original source...
  17. Rankavat, S., & Tiwari, G. (2016). Pedestrians risk perception of traffic crash and built environment features - Delhi, India. Safety Science, 87, 1-7. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2016.03.009 Go to original source...
  18. Räsänen, M., Lajunen, T., Alticafarbay, F., & Aydin, C. (2007). Pedestrian self-reports of factors influencing the use of pedestrian bridges. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 39(5), 969-973. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2007.01.004 Go to original source...
  19. Sinclair, M., & Zuidgeest, M. (2016). Investigations into pedestrian crossing choices on Cape Town freeways. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 42, 479-494. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2015.07.006 Go to original source...
  20. Soliz, A., & Pérez-López, R. (2022). Footbridges': pedestrian infrastructure or urban barrier? Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 55, 101161. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2022.101161 Go to original source...
  21. Tanaboriboon, Y., & Jing, Q. (1994). CHINESE PEDESTRIANS AND THEIR WALKING CHARACTERISTICS: CASE STUDY IN BEIJING. Transportation Research Record, 1441. Retrieved from: https://onlinepubs.trb.org/Onlinepubs/trr/1994/1441/1441-003.pdf
  22. Tenny, S., & Hoffman, M. R. (2024). Odds Ratio. In StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK431098/
  23. Tiwari, S. R. (2020). Influence of actual and perceived risks in selecting crossing facilities by pedestrians. Travel Behaviour and Society, 21, 1-9. doi:10.1016/j.tbs.2020.05.003 Go to original source...
  24. Tom, A., & Granié, M. A. (2011). Gender differences in pedestrian rule compliance and visual search at signalized and unsignalized crossroads. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 43(5), 1794-1801. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2011.04.012 Go to original source...
  25. Zhu, M. Z. (2023). Do footbridge and underpass improve pedestrian safety? A Hong Kong case study using three-dimensional digital map of pedestrian network. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 186, 107064. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2023.107064 Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.