Transactions on Transport Sciences 2023, 14(3):54-60 | DOI: 10.5507/tots.2023.013
Private Car Ownership in Presence of Shared Autonomous Vehicles, Case of Tehran
- a. Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
- b. Department of Civil Engineering, East Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
With the advent of autonomous vehicles (AVs), researchers have conducted various studies on the impacts of these vehicles, but limited research is found on the influence of AVs on private car ownership. Since AVs are not well-aligned with sustainable development, shared autonomous vehicles (SAVs) would be an appealing alternative. Hence, this paper aims to investigate the impact of socio-economic and travel-related characteristics on private car ownership in the presence of SAVs among private car users in Tehran. After designing a web-based stated preference (SP) questionnaire and analyzing 2154 valid SP responses in 2022, more than a quarter (26%) of the observations are willing to reduce private car ownership level in presence of SAVs. Estimation results of binary logit model reveal that respondents aged 31-35 and 22-25 years old, as compared to other age categories, are more and less, respectively likely to sell their private cars. Further, due to the fact that users of SAVs, unlike private cars, do not need parking space, respondent are more likely to sell their private cars under this condition. Estimated coefficients of attributes considered in the SP scenarios indicate that increasing each of these attributes (travel time, waiting time, travel cost and number of passengers) in SAVs reduce the likelihood of selling a private car. Another important finding is the impact of respondents' experience with internet taxis (taxis ordered via an app on smartphones); those with frequent use or satisfy with this service, are more likely to reduce their car ownership.
Keywords: Shared Autonomous Vehicle (SAV), Car Ownership, Stated Preference, Binary Logit.
Received: January 29, 2023; Revised: May 14, 2023; Accepted: May 17, 2023; Prepublished online: August 2, 2023; Published: December 13, 2023 Show citation
ACS | AIP | APA | ASA | Harvard | Chicago | Chicago Notes | IEEE | ISO690 | MLA | NLM | Turabian | Vancouver |
References
- Abbasi, M., and Hadji Hosseinlou, M. (2022). Assessing Feasibility of overnight-charging electric bus in a real-world BRT system in the context of a developing country. Scientia Iranica.
- Abbasi, M., Hosseinlou, M. H., and JafarzadehFadaki, S. (2020). An investigation of Bus Rapid Transit System (BRT) based on economic and air pollution analysis (Tehran, Iran). Case Studies on Transport Policy, 8(2), 553-563.
Go to original source...
- Abbasi, M., Mamdoohi, A. R., Sierpiński, G., and Ciari, F. (2023). Usage Intention of Shared Autonomous Vehicles with Dynamic Ride Sharing on Long-Distance Trips. Sustainability, 15(2), 1649.
Go to original source...
- Aboutorabi Kashani, M., Abbasi, M., Mamdoohi, A. R., and Sierpiński, G. (2023). The Role of Attitude, Travel-Related, and Socioeconomic Characteristics in Modal Shift to Shared Autonomous Vehicles with Ride Sharing. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 14(1), 23.
Go to original source...
- Bansal, P., and Kockelman, K. M. (2017). Forecasting Americans' long-term adoption of connected and autonomous vehicle technologies. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 95, 49-63.
Go to original source...
- Becker, H., Ciari, F., and Axhausen, K. W. (2018). Measuring the car ownership impact of free-floating car-sharing-A case study in Basel, Switzerland. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 65, 51-62.
Go to original source...
- Blumenberg, E., Paul, J., and Pierce, G. (2021). Travel in the digital age: Vehicle ownership and technology-facilitated accessibility. Transport Policy, 103, 86-94.
Go to original source...
- Clark, B. (2012). Understanding how household car ownership changes over time University of the West of England.
- Clark, B., Chatterjee, K., and Melia, S. (2016). Changes in level of household car ownership: the role of life events and spatial context. Transportation, 43, 565-599.
Go to original source...
- Dargay, J., and Hanly, M. (2007). Volatility of car ownership, commuting mode and time in the UK. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 41(10), 934-948.
Go to original source...
- Duarte, F., and Ratti, C. (2018). The impact of autonomous vehicles on cities: A review. Journal of Urban Technology, 25(4), 3-18.
Go to original source...
- Fagnant, D. J., and Kockelman, K. (2015). Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 77, 167-181.
Go to original source...
- Farzin, I., Abbasi, M., Macioszek, E., Mamdoohi, A. R., and Ciari, F. (2023). Moving toward a More Sustainable Autonomous Mobility, Case of Heterogeneity in Preferences. Sustainability, 15(1), 460. Retrieved from: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/460
Go to original source...
- Golbabaei, F., Yigitcanlar, T., and Bunker, J. (2021). The role of shared autonomous vehicle systems in delivering smart urban mobility: A systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 15(10), 731-748.
Go to original source...
- Hawkins, J., and Nurul Habib, K. (2019). Integrated models of land use and transportation for the autonomous vehicle revolution. Transport reviews, 39(1), 66-83.
Go to original source...
- Hensher, D. A., and Johnson, L. W. (2018). Applied discrete-choice modelling. Routledge.
- Hensher, D. A., Rose, J. M., Rose, J. M., and Greene, W. H. (2005). Applied choice analysis: a primer. Cambridge university press.
Go to original source...
- Holmgren, J. (2020). The effect of public transport quality on car ownership-A source of wider benefits? Research in Transportation Economics, 83, 100957.
Go to original source...
- Hossein Rashidi, T., and Mohammadian, K. (2016). Application of a nested trivariate copula structure in a competing duration hazard-based vehicle transaction decision model. Transportmetrica A: transport science, 12(6), 550-567.
Go to original source...
- Jiang, Y., Zhang, J., Wang, Y., and Wang, W. (2019). Capturing ownership behavior of autonomous vehicles in Japan based on a stated preference survey and a mixed logit model with repeated choices. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 13(10), 788-801.
Go to original source...
- Jones, E. C., and Leibowicz, B. D. (2019). Contributions of shared autonomous vehicles to climate change mitigation. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 72, 279-298.
Go to original source...
- Liao, F., Molin, E., Timmermans, H., and van Wee, B. (2020). Carsharing: the impact of system characteristics on its potential to replace private car trips and reduce car ownership. Transportation, 47(2), 935-970.
Go to original source...
- Litman, T. (2017). Autonomous vehicle implementation predictions (p. 28). Victoria, BC, Canada: Victoria Transport Policy Institute.
- Menon, N., Barbour, N., Zhang, Y., Pinjari, A. R., and Mannering, F. (2019). Shared autonomous vehicles and their potential impacts on household vehicle ownership: An exploratory empirical assessment. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 13(2), 111-122.
Go to original source...
- Millard-Ball, A., and Schipper, L. (2011). Are we reaching peak travel? Trends in passenger transport in eight industrialized countries. Transport reviews, 31(3), 357-378.
Go to original source...
- Mulalic, I., and Rouwendal, J. (2020). Does improving public transport decrease car ownership? Evidence from a residential sorting model for the Copenhagen metropolitan area. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 83, 103543.
Go to original source...
- Polzin, S. E., Chu, X., and Godfrey, J. (2014). The impact of millennials' travel behavior on future personal vehicle travel. Energy Strategy Reviews, 5, 59-65.
Go to original source...
- Seyedabrishami, S., Mamdoohi, A., Barzegar, A., and Hasanpour, S. (2012). Impact of carpooling on fuel saving in urban transportation: case study of Tehran. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 54, 323-331.
Go to original source...
- Shaheen, S., and Cohen, A. (2019). Shared ride services in North America: definitions, impacts, and the future of pooling. Transport reviews, 39(4), 427-442.
Go to original source...
- Shaygan, M., Mamdoohi, A., and Masoumi, H. E. (2017). Car ownership models in Iran: a review of methods and determinants. Transport and Telecommunication, 18(1), 45.
Go to original source...
- Stocker, A., and Shaheen, S. (2018). Shared automated mobility: early exploration and potential impacts. Road vehicle automation 4, 125-139.
Go to original source...
- Tao, S., He, S. Y., and Thøgersen, J. (2019). The role of car ownership in attitudes towards public transport: A comparative study of Guangzhou and Brisbane. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 60, 685-699.
Go to original source...
- Train, K. E. (2009). Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge university press.
- WHO. (2013). Global status report on road safety 2013: supporting a decade of action: summary.
- Zhou, F., Zheng, Z., Whitehead, J., Perrons, R. K., Washington, S., and Page, L. (2020). Examining the impact of car-sharing on private vehicle ownership. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 138, 322-341.
Go to original source...
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.