Transactions on Transport Sciences 2022, 13(2):18-26 | DOI: 10.5507/tots.2022.006

Pedestrians' Crossing Behaviors and Crossing Preferences: A Field Study

Sena Çinara, ªerife Yilmazb, Bahar Özb
a. Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Middle East Technical University, City Planning, Ankara, Turkey
b. Safety Research Unit, Department of Psychology, Middle East Technical University, 06800, Ankara, Turkey

Pedestrians are one of the most vulnerable road user groups in traffic and face many risky situations in traffic, especially when pedestrians cross the street, where a pedestrians-vehicle interaction or conflict is most likely. Different from the previous studies on pedestrian behavior, the current study targeted exploring pedestrian behavior and safety at a specific street in Ankara-Tunali Hilmi Street Turkey employing two different data collection methods. Specifically, the current study aimed to understand the behaviors, perceptions, and crossing preferences of pedestrians in the study area. In addition to the above, it aimed to identify situations that create safety concerns for pedestrians in the area and offer area-specific countermeasures addressing these concerns. For this purpose, an online survey study and an observational study were conducted. The results of the survey based on investigations of the crossing preferences of 96 pedestrians revealed an understanding of the participants' motivation when crossing the street, their attitudes toward traffic rules, and their safety perceptions about the area. Additionally, it targeted to understand the situations that negatively affect road safety in the area for pedestrians. According to the survey respondents, the study area was unsafe for pedestrians and the biggest problem in terms of pedestrian safety is vehicle traffic and parking. The observation study presented significant differences in crosswalk use, compliance with the signal between pedestrians who cross alone or in a pair and those who cross in a group. People who cross the street as a group use crosswalk and comply with the traffic signal more than people crossing alone or in a pair. In addition, considering the illegal crossing rate, it can be said that jaywalkers - people who do not use crosswalk - are the majority in the study area. As a result, the current study helps to arrange crossing facilities according to pedestrian preference because the proper design of facilities contributes to pedestrian safety and encourages walking without sacrificing safety and comfort. Accordingly, reducing vehicle traffic, increasing and arranging parking areas, and increasing number of pedestrian facilities are suggested to increase pedestrian safety in the area.

Keywords: Pedestrian crossing, pedestrian behaviors, pedestrian pereferences, signalized crosswalk, observational study, survey

Received: October 26, 2021; Revised: March 3, 2022; Accepted: April 20, 2022; Prepublished online: May 31, 2022; Published: August 18, 2022  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Çinar, S., Yilmaz, ª., & Öz, B. (2022). Pedestrians' Crossing Behaviors and Crossing Preferences: A Field Study. Transactions on Transport Sciences13(2), 18-26. doi: 10.5507/tots.2022.006
Download citation

References

  1. Aghabayk, K., Esmailpour, J., Jafari, A., & Shiwakoti, N. (2021). Observational-based study to explore pedestrian crossing behaviors at signalized and unsignalized crosswalks. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 151(January), 105990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.105990 Go to original source...
  2. Carter, D. L., Hunter, W. W., Zegeer, C. v., Stewart, J. R., & Huang, A. H. F. (2006). Pedestrian and Bicyclist Intersection Safety Indices. Security, April, 99. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/safety/pedbike/06130/06130.pdf
  3. Coutts, C., Wenger, R., & Duncan, M. (2019). Exploratory Analysis of Revealed Pedestrian Paths as Cues for Designing Pedestrian Infrastructure. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 145(4), 05019017. Go to original source...
  4. Demiroz, Y. I., Onelcin, P., & Alver, Y. (2015). Illegal road crossing behavior of pedestrians at overpass locations: Factors affecting gap acceptance, crossing times and overpass use. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 80, 220-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.04.018 Go to original source...
  5. Ferenchak, N. N. (2016). Pedestrian age and gender in relation to crossing behavior at midblock crossings in India. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), 3(4), 345-351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtte.2015.12.001 Go to original source...
  6. Ghadimkhani, P. (2011). Increasing walkability in public spaces of city centres: The case of Tunali Hilmi Street, Ankara. Middle East Technical University.
  7. Hamed, M. M. (2001). Analysis of pedestrians' behavior at pedestrian crossings. Safety Science, 38(1), 63-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00058-8 Go to original source...
  8. Herrero-Fernández, D., MacÍa-Guerrero, P., Silvano-Chaparro, L., Merino, L., & Jenchura, E. C. (2016). Risky behavior in young adult pedestrians: Personality determinants, correlates with risk perception, and gender differences. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 36, 14-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2015.11.007 Go to original source...
  9. Holland, C., & Hill, R. (2010). Gender differences in factors predicting unsafe crossing decisions in adult pedestrians across the lifespan: A simulation study. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 42(4), 1097-1106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2009.12.023 Go to original source...
  10. Kadali, B. R., & Vedagiri, P. (2013). Modelling pedestrian road crossing behaviour under mixed traffic condition. European transport, 55(3), 1-17.
  11. Khayesi, M. (2020). Vulnerable Road Users or Vulnerable Transport Planning? Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 2(June). https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2020.00025 Go to original source...
  12. Ministry of Interior. (2019). Retrieved from https://www.icisleri.gov.tr/trafikte-yaya-onceligi-seferberligi
  13. Papadimitriou, E., Lassarre, S., & Yannis, G. (2017). Human factors of pedestrian walking and crossing behaviour. Transportation Research Procedia, 25, 2002-2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.trpro.2017.05.396 Go to original source...
  14. Reason, J., Manstead, A., Stephen, S., Baxter, J., & Campbell, K. (1990). Errors and violations on the roads: A real distinction? Ergonomics, 33(10-11), 1315-1332. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139008925335 Go to original source...
  15. Ren, G., Zhou, Z., Wang, W., Zhang, Y., & Wang, W. (2011). Crossing behaviors of pedestrians at signalized intersections: Observational study and survey in China. Transportation Research Record, 2264, 65-73. https://doi.org/10.3141/2264-08 Go to original source...
  16. Schultz, C. L., Sayers, S. P., Wilhelm Stanis, S. A., Thombs, L. A., Thomas, I. M., & Canfield, S. M. (2015). The Impact of a Signalized Crosswalk on Traffic Speed and Street-Crossing Behaviors of Residents in an Underserved Neighborhood. Journal of Urban Health, 92(5), 910-922. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11524-015-9979-7 Go to original source...
  17. Sisiopiku, V. P., & Akin, D. (2003). Pedestrian behaviors at and perceptions towards various pedestrian facilities: An examination based on observation and survey data. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 6(4), 249-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.trf.2003.06.001 Go to original source...
  18. Soathong, A., Chowdhury, S., Wilson, D., & Ranjitkar, P. (2021). Investigating the motivation for pedestrians' risky crossing behaviour at urban mid-block road sections. Travel Behaviour and Society, 22(August 2020), 155-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2020.09.005 Go to original source...
  19. Southworth, M.F. (2005). Designing the Walkable City. Journal of Urban Planning and Development-asce, 131, 246-257. Go to original source...
  20. ªiºman, E., Etli, B. (2007). Tekirdağ Kent Merkezindeki Yaya Bölgelerinin Belirlenmesi ve Projelendirilmesi. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 4(3), 327-338.
  21. Tarawneh, M. S. (2001). Evaluation of pedestrian speed in Jordan with investigation of some contributing factors. Journal of safety research, 32(2), 229-236. Go to original source...
  22. Turkish Standards Institute, "TS 12576 Urban Roads - Structural Preventive and Sign Design Criteria on Accessibility in Sidewalks and Pedestrian Crossings", June 2012.
  23. Turkish Statistical Institute. (2021). Road Traffic Accident Statistics, 2020. Retrieved from https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Road-Traffic-Accident-Statistics-2020-37436&dil=2
  24. Yagil, D. (2000). Beliefs, motives and situational factors related to pedestrians' self-reported behavior at signal-controlled crossings. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 3(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-8478(00)00004-8 Go to original source...
  25. Yannis, G., Papadimitriou, E., & Theofilatos, A. (2013). Pedestrian gap acceptance for mid-block street crossing. Transportation Planning and Technology, 36(5), 450-462. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081060.2013.818274 Go to original source...
  26. Zegeer, C. V., Richard Stewart, J., Huang, H., & Lagerwey, P. (2001). Safety Effects of Marked Versus Unmarked Crosswalks at Uncontrolled Locations: Analysis of Pedestrian Crashes in 30 Cities. Transportation Research Record, 1773(1), 56-68. https://doi.org/10.3141/1773-07 Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.