Transactions on Transport Sciences 2022, 13(1):54-64 | DOI: 10.5507/tots.2022.002

Investigating Key Factors Influencing Purchase Intention of Electric Motorcycle in Indonesia

Yuniaristantoa, Martha Widhi Dela Utamib, Wahyudi Sutopoc, Muhammad Hisjama
a. Department of Industrial Engineering, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia
b. Anugerah Pharmindo Lestari Inc., 135 Senen Raya St., Jakarta, Indonesia
c. University Centre of Excellence for Electrical Energy Storage Technology, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia

Indonesia is the top three global motorcycle market, contributing to the high CO2 emissions. Electric motorcycles (EMs) are an effective way to reduce CO2 emissions. This study examines the purchase intentions of EMs that focus on micro-levels, cost, technological and macro-level factors. Partial Least Square - Structural Equation Model (PLS-SEM) is used to explore the significant factors and the relationship among these factors in constructing the purchase intention model. The questionnaire survey collected from 1,223 respondents shows that almost 82% of respondents revealed their intention to buy EMs. This result indicates that the future of the EM market is very promising. This research also finds that macro-level, technology and cost factors are significant factors in the purchase intention of EMs. Consumers are still reluctant to buy EMs due to the barriers in the charging station infrastructure, tax and incentive policies, EM prices, battery costs, charging time, and battery life resulting in consumers choosing a "wait and see" decision in adopting EMs. Meanwhile, respondent characteristics such as age, education, and income level do not significantly affect the EM purchase intention. Respondents who have extensive social networks and are concerned about the environment are more willing to adopt EMs.

Keywords: Purchase intention; questionnaire survey; electric motorcycle; PLS-SEM; Indonesia

Received: November 21, 2021; Revised: January 20, 2022; Accepted: February 10, 2022; Prepublished online: March 23, 2022; Published: May 12, 2022  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Yuniaristanto,, Dela Utami, M.W., Sutopo, W., & Hisjam, M. (2022). Investigating Key Factors Influencing Purchase Intention of Electric Motorcycle in Indonesia. Transactions on Transport Sciences13(1), 54-64. doi: 10.5507/tots.2022.002
Download citation

References

  1. AISI. (2020). Domestic Distribution and Export Statistics. http://www.aisi.or.id/statistic
  2. Berkeley, N., Jarvis, D., & Jones, A. (2018). Analysing the take up of battery electric vehicles: An investigation of barriers amongst drivers in the UK. Transportation Research Part D: Transport …. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361920917301001
  3. BPS. (2018). Perkembangan Jumlah Kendaraan Bermotor Menurut Jenis 1949-2018. http://www.bps.go.id/linkTableDinamis/view/id/1133
  4. Browne, D., O'Mahony, M., & Caulfield, B. (2012). How should barriers to alternative fuels and vehicles be classified and potential policies to promote innovative technologies be evaluated? Journal of Cleaner Production, 35, 140-151. Go to original source...
  5. Caperello, N. D., & Kurani, K. S. (2012). Households' stories of their encounters with a plug-in hybrid electric vehicle. Environment and Behavior, 44(4), 493-508. Go to original source...
  6. Chen, Y., Ebenstein, A., Greenstone, M., & Li, H. (2013). Evidence on the impact of sustained exposure to air pollution on life expectancy from China's Huai River policy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(32), 12936-12941. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1300018110 Go to original source...
  7. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic press.
  8. Eccarius, T., & Lu, C.-C. (2020a). Adoption intentions for micro-mobility - Insights from electric scooter sharing in Taiwan. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102327 Go to original source...
  9. Eccarius, T., & Lu, C.-C. (2020b). Powered two-wheelers for sustainable mobility: A review of consumer adoption of electric motorcycles. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 14(3), 215-231. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2018.1540735 Go to original source...
  10. Egbue, O., & Long, S. (2012). Barriers to widespread adoption of electric vehicles: An analysis of consumer attitudes and perceptions. Energy Policy, 48, 717-729. Go to original source...
  11. Etikan, I. (2016). Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11 Go to original source...
  12. Gaikindo. Tahun 2040 Indonesia Stop Mobil Berbahan Bakar Minyak. https://www.gaikindo.or.id/tahun-2040-indonesia-stop-mobil-berbahan-bakar-minyak/
  13. Goldenberg, S. (2015). Indonesia to cut carbon emissions by 29% by 2030. In The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/sep/21/indonesia-promises-to-cut-carbon-emissions-by-29-by-2030
  14. Graham-Rowe, E., Gardner, B., Abraham, C., Skippon, S., Dittmar, H., Hutchins, R., & Stannard, J. (2012). Mainstream consumers driving plug-in battery-electric and plug-in hybrid electric cars: A qualitative analysis of responses and evaluations. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46(1), 140-153. Go to original source...
  15. Guerra, E. (2019). Electric vehicles, air pollution, and the motorcycle city: A stated preference survey of consumers' willingness to adopt electric motorcycles in Solo, Indonesia. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 68, 52-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.07.027 Go to original source...
  16. Habich-Sobiegalla, S., Kostka, G., & Anzinger, N. (2018). Electric vehicle purchase intentions of Chinese, Russian and Brazilian citizens: An international comparative study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 205, 188-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.318 Go to original source...
  17. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage publications.
  18. Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203 Go to original source...
  19. Higueras-Castillo, E., Liébana-Cabanillas, F. J., Muñoz-Leiva, F., & García-Maroto, I. (2019). Evaluating consumer attitudes toward electromobility and the moderating effect of perceived consumer effectiveness. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 51, 387-398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.07.006 Go to original source...
  20. Huang, S. K., Kuo, L., & Chou, K.-L. (2018). The impacts of government policies on green utilization diffusion and social benefits - A case study of electric motorcycles in Taiwan. Energy Policy, 119, 473-486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.04.061 Go to original source...
  21. Indonesian Government. (2019). Presidential Regulation Number 55 of 2019: Acceleration of the Battery Electric Vehicle Program for Road Transportation. https://peraturan.go.id/peraturan/view.html?id=3e227ec8ad446de9a348afdf7de4b0cb
  22. Jensen, A. F., Cherchi, E., & Mabit, S. L. (2013). On the stability of preferences and attitudes before and after experiencing an electric vehicle. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 25, 24-32. Go to original source...
  23. Jones, L. R., Cherry, C. R., Vu, T. A., & Nguyen, Q. N. (2013). The effect of incentives and technology on the adoption of electric motorcycles: A stated choice experiment in Vietnam. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 57, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2013.09.003 Go to original source...
  24. Kim, M.-K., Oh, J., Park, J.-H., & Joo, C. (2018). Perceived value and adoption intention for electric vehicles in Korea: Moderating effects of environmental traits and government supports. Energy, 159, 799-809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.06.064 Go to original source...
  25. Krause, R. M., Carley, S. R., Lane, B. W., & Graham, J. D. (2013). Perception and reality: Public knowledge of plug-in electric vehicles in 21 US cities. Energy Policy, 63, 433-440. Go to original source...
  26. Krupa, J. S., Rizzo, D. M., Eppstein, M. J., Lanute, D. B., Gaalema, D. E., Lakkaraju, K., & Warrender, C. E. (2014). Analysis of a consumer survey on plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 64, 14-31. Go to original source...
  27. Lee, J., Baig, F., Talpur, M. A. H., & Shaikh, S. (2021). Public intentions to purchase electric vehicles in Pakistan. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105523 Go to original source...
  28. Liu, Y., & Lai, I. K. W. (2020). The Effects of Environmental Policy and the Perception of Electric Motorcycles on the Acceptance of Electric Motorcycles: An Empirical Study in Macau. SAGE Open, 10(1), 2158244019899091. Go to original source...
  29. Natalia, D. L. (n.d.). Upaya agar kendaraan listrik "mengaspal" di Indonesia - ANTARA News. Retrieved December 12, 2021, from https://www.antaranews.com/berita/2380398/upaya-agar-kendaraan-listrik-mengaspal-di-indonesia
  30. Samosir, G., Devara, Y., Florentina, B., & Siregar, R. (2018). Electric vehicles in Indonesia: the road towards sustainable transportation. Solidiance: Market Report.
  31. Sang, Y.-N., & Bekhet, H. A. (2015). Modelling electric vehicle usage intentions: An empirical study in Malaysia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 92, 75-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.045 Go to original source...
  32. She, Z. Y., Sun, Q., Ma, J. J., & Xie, B. C. (2017). What are the barriers to widespread adoption of battery electric vehicles? A survey of public perception in Tianjin, China. Transport Policy, 56, 29-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.03.001 Go to original source...
  33. Sierzchula, W. (2014). Factors influencing fleet manager adoption of electric vehicles. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 31, 126-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2014.05.022 Go to original source...
  34. Sovacool, B. K., & Hirsh, R. F. (2009). Beyond batteries: An examination of the benefits and barriers to plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) and a vehicle-to-grid (V2G) transition. Energy Policy, 37(3), 1095-1103. Go to original source...
  35. Statistics Indonesia. (n.d.). Growth in Number of Vehicles by Type. Retrieved October 4, 2021, from https://www.bps.go.id/indicator/17/57/1/jumlah-kendaraan-bermotor.html
  36. Tarei, P. K., Chand, P., & Gupta, H. (2021). Barriers to the adoption of electric vehicles: Evidence from India. Journal of Cleaner Production, 291, 125847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125847 Go to original source...
  37. Utami, M. W. Dela, Yuniaristanto, Y., & Sutopo, W. (2020). Adoption Intention Model of Electric Vehicle in Indonesia. Jurnal Optimasi Sistem Industri, 19(1), 70-81. Go to original source...
  38. Wang, Y.-W. (2007). An optimal location choice model for recreation-oriented scooter recharge stations. In Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment (Vol. 12, Issue 3, pp. 231-237). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2007.02.002 Go to original source...
  39. Wu, J.-H., Wu, C.-W., Lee, C.-T., & Lee, H.-J. (2015). Green purchase intentions: An exploratory study of the Taiwanese electric motorcycle market. Journal of Business Research, 68(4), 829-833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.11.036 Go to original source...
  40. Zhuge, C., & Shao, C. (2019). Investigating the factors influencing the uptake of electric vehicles in Beijing, China: Statistical and spatial perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 213, 199-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.099 Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.