Transactions on Transport Sciences 2021, 12(2):45-52 | DOI: 10.5507/tots.2021.014

How people speak about autonomous cars - an analysis of internet discussions in Czech Republic

Petr Zámečníka, Darina Havlíčkováb, Adam Gregorovičb, Petr Děckýb, Sára Klečkováb
a. Katedra Psychologie, Filosofická fakulta, Univerzita Palackého, Křížkovského 10, Olomouc 77180, Česká republika
b. CDV - Transport Research Centre, Lisenska 33a, 636 00 Brno, Czech Republic

This study aims to explore and to define the main topics and concerns regarding the issue of autonomous vehicles in the Czech population. Further, the change of these topics throughout time is explored. To do this, the qualitative content analysis of comments below news articles concerning autonomous vehicles on popular Czech Internet websites was performed to extract main discussed topics.

With a huge development of autonomous vehicles (AVs) and its technology, the question of successful implementation arises. The acceptance of this technology by the end users stands for an important factor of the implementation. For this, general attitudes toward autonomous vehicles and various concerns of people provide important information. The aim of this paper is to explore main topics and concerns regarding the issue of autonomous vehicles in the Czech population. The qualitative analysis of internet discussions beneath news articles about autonomous vehicles (AVs) on popular Czech news portals was performed. Two separated data collections were performed for a total of 17 articles from July 2014 to February 2020 to address the changes in attitudes through time. Content analysis revealed a general skepticism and a large number of concerns. The negativity and fear of the Czech discussants stemmed mainly from insufficient knowledge of the topic. Content analysis revealed main topics concerned the introduction of autonomous mobility into general practice in terms of time (when), experience (especially previous negative experience with elements of control automation), and analogy (comparisons to other modes of transport). Other important topics addressed driving pleasure, (dis)trust of manufacturers, legal and ethical questions about AV, risk of hacker attacks, reactions of drivers of conventional vehicles, carsharing, financial use of AV, manual takeover, application of AV only for some modes of transportation (e.g., freight transport), and a difficulty of introducing AVs into the Czech environment. In contrast to foreign opinion polls, there were no topics related to privacy and the misuse of personal data. It was not possible to find socio-demographic variables from the discussion threads, but information about the preference of news portals by older age groups was obtained from the data on the monitored portals. Assuming that authors of the comments were older people, the negative attitude towards AV corresponds to the current literature. In order to ensure representative data, it will be necessary to identify socio-demographic variables and the extension of the analyzed discussion threads to social networks as part of further research. Without these preconditions, it will be difficult to determine accurate evaluations and possibly to create an educational campaign for the general public focused on autonomous mobility.

Keywords: Automated vehicles, autonomous vehicles, driverless cars, internet discussions

Received: December 22, 2020; Revised: June 4, 2021; Accepted: June 24, 2021; Prepublished online: June 24, 2021; Published: November 16, 2021  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Zámečník, P., Havlíčková, D., Gregorovič, A., Děcký, P., & Klečková, S. (2021). How people speak about autonomous cars - an analysis of internet discussions in Czech Republic. Transactions on Transport Sciences12(2), 45-52. doi: 10.5507/tots.2021.014
Download citation

References

  1. AAA Newsroom. (2018). AAA: American Trust in Autonomous Vehicles Slips [Online]. Retrieved May 02, 2020, from https://newsroom.aaa.com/2018/05/aaa-american-trust-autonomous-vehicles-slips/
  2. Acheampong, R. A., & Cugurullo, F. (2019). Capturing the behavioural determinants behind the adoption of autonomous vehicles: Conceptual frameworks and measurement models to predict public transport, sharing and ownership trends of self-driving cars. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology And Behaviour, 62, 349-375. Go to original source...
  3. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior And Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. Go to original source...
  4. Bansal, P., Kockelman, K. M., & Singh, A. (2016). Assessing public opinions of and interest in new vehicle technologies: An Austin perspective. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 67, 1-14. Go to original source...
  5. Deloitte. (2019). 2019 Global Automotive Consumer Study: Consumer trends in the automotive industry.
  6. Doyle, B. (2016). 5 Reasons Why Google Glass was a Miserable Failure [Online]. Retrieved April 05, 2020, from https://www.business2community.com/tech-gadgets/5-reasons-google-glass-miserable-failure-01462398
  7. Flinders, K. (2017). Brits expect driverless cars to outnumber normal cars in 15 years [Online]. Retrieved November 02, 2020, from https://www.computerweekly.com/news/450419079/Brits-expect-driverless-cars-to-outnumber-normal-cars-in-15-years
  8. Gabrhel, V., Ježek, S., & Havlíčková, D. (2019). Public opinion on connected and automated vehicles: the Czech context. Transactions On Transport Sciences, 10(2), 42-52. Go to original source...
  9. Gao, P., Hensley, R., & Zielke, A. (2014). A road map to the future for the auto industry. McKinsey Quarterly
  10. Hudson, J., Orviska, M., & Hunady, J. (2019). People's attitudes to autonomous vehicles. Transportation Research Part A: Policy And Practice, 121, 164-176. Go to original source...
  11. Kalogeropoulos, A. (2019). How Younger Generations Consume News Differently [Online]. Retrieved October 29, 2020, from https://www.digitalnewsreport.org/survey/2019/how-younger-generations-consume-news-differently/
  12. Kelley, K., Clark, B., Brown, V., & Sitzia, J. (2003). Good practice in the conduct and reporting of survey research. International Journal for Quality in health care, 15(3), 261-266. Go to original source...
  13. Kilian, T., Hennigs, N., & Langner, S. (2012). Do Millennials read books or blogs? Introducing a media usage typology of the internet generation. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 29(2), 114-124. Go to original source...
  14. Khasawneh, O. Y. (2018). Technophobia without boarders: The influence of technophobia and emotional intelligence on technology acceptance and the moderating influence of organizational climate. Computers In Human Behavior, 88, 210-218. Go to original source...
  15. König, M., & Neumayr, L. (2017). Users' resistance towards radical innovations: The case of the self-driving car. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology And Behaviour, 44, 42-52. Go to original source...
  16. Koul, S., & Eydgahi, A. (2020). The Impact of Social Influence, Technophobia, and Perceived Safety on Autonomous Vehicle Technology Adoption. Periodica Polytechnica Transportation Engineering, 48(2), 133-142. Go to original source...
  17. Kyriakidis, M., Happee, R., & de Winter, J. C. F. (2015). Public opinion on automated driving: Results of an international questionnaire among 5000 respondents. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology And Behaviour, 32, 127-140. Go to original source...
  18. Lavieri, P. S., Garikapati, V. M., Bhat, C. R., Pendyala, R. M., Astroza, S., & Dias, F. F. (2017). Modeling Individual Preferences for Ownership and Sharing of Autonomous Vehicle Technologies. Transportation Research Record: Journal Of The Transportation Research Board, 2665(1), 1-10. Go to original source...
  19. Li, T., Lin, L., Choi, M., Fu, K., Gong, S., & Wang, J. (2018). YouTube AV 50K: An Annotated Corpus for Comments in Autonomous Vehicles. 2018 International Joint Symposium On Artificial Intelligence And Natural Language Processing (Isai-Nlp), 1-5. Go to original source...
  20. McFadden, C. (2017). Concorde: The Real Reason Why the Supersonic Passenger Jet Failed [Online]. Retrieved April 06, 2020, from https://interestingengineering.com/concorde-the-real-reason-why-the-supersonic-passenger-jet-failed
  21. Moons, I., & De Pelsmacker, P. (2015). An Extended Decomposed Theory of Planned Behaviour to Predict the Usage Intention of the Electric Car: A Multi-Group Comparison. Sustainability, 7(5), 6212-6245. Go to original source...
  22. Nielsen, T. A. S., & Haustein, S. (2018). On sceptics and enthusiasts: What are the expectations towards self-driving cars? Transport Policy, 66, 49-55. Go to original source...
  23. Pakusch, C., Stevens, G., Boden, A., & Bossauer, P. (2018). Unintended Effects of Autonomous Driving: A Study on Mobility Preferences in the Future. Sustainability, 10(7). Go to original source...
  24. Patall, E. A., Sylvester, B. J., & Han, C. -woo. (2014). The role of competence in the effects of choice on motivation. Journal Of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 27-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.09.002 Go to original source...
  25. Payre, W., Cestac, J., & Delhomme, P. (2014). Intention to use a fully automated car: Attitudes and a priori acceptability. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology And Behaviour, 27, 252-263. Go to original source...
  26. Rasouli, A., & Tsotsos, J. K. (2020). Autonomous Vehicles That Interact With Pedestrians: A Survey of Theory and Practice [Online]. Ieee Transactions On Intelligent Transportation Systems, 21(3), 900-918. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2019.2901817 Go to original source...
  27. Rudin-Brown, C. M., & Noy, Y. I. (2002). Investigation of Behavioral Adaptation to Lane Departure Warnings. Transportation Research Record: Journal Of The Transportation Research Board, 1803(1), 30-37. Go to original source...
  28. Saeed, T. U., Burris, M. W., Labi, S., & Sinha, K. C. (2020). An empirical discourse on forecasting the use of autonomous vehicles using consumers' preferences. Technological Forecasting And Social Change, 158. Go to original source...
  29. SAE. (2019). SAE Standards News: J3016 automated-driving graphic update [Online]. Retrieved October 16, 2020, from https://www.sae.org/news/2019/01/sae-updates-j3016-automated-driving-graphic
  30. Schoettle, B., & Sivak, M. (2014a). A survey of public opinion about connected vehicles in the U.S., the U.K., and Australia. 2014 International Conference On Connected Vehicles And Expo (Iccve), 687-692. Go to original source...
  31. Schoettle, B., & Sivak, M. (2014b). Public opinion about self-driving vehicles in China, India, Japan, the U.S., the U.K., and Australia. Michigan: University of Michigan: Transportation Research Institute
  32. Smith, A., & Anderson, M. (2017). Automation in Everyday Life. Washington, D.C.: Pew Research Center
  33. Stanton, N. A., & Young, M. S. (2007). Driver behaviour with adaptive cruise control. Ergonomics, 48(10), 1294-1313. Go to original source...
  34. van Arem, B., van Driel, C. J. G., & Visser, R. (2006). The Impact of Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control on Traffic-Flow Characteristics. Ieee Transactions On Intelligent Transportation Systems, 7(4), 429-436. Go to original source...
  35. Wang, Y., Wang, S., Wang, J., Wei, J., & Wang, C. (2020). An empirical study of consumers' intention to use ride-sharing services: using an extended technology acceptance model. Transportation, 47(1), 397-415. Go to original source...
  36. Wright, K. B. (2005). Researching Internet-Based Populations: Advantages and Disadvantages of Online Survey Research, Online Questionnaire Authoring Software Packages, and Web Survey Services. Journal Of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(3). Go to original source...
  37. Yuen, K. F., Chua, G., Wang, X., Ma, F., & Li, K. X. (2020). Understanding Public Acceptance of Autonomous Vehicles Using the Theory of Planned Behaviour. International Journal Of Environmental Research And Public Health, 17(12). Go to original source...
  38. https://www.autorevue.cz/autonomni-vozidla-budou-nebezpecna-a-nespolehliva-mysli-si-ridicihttps://www.auto.cz/autonomni-automobilove-prototypy-vykazuji-tisice-poruch-92094https://www.svethardware.cz/anketa-nastava-cas-autonomnich-vozidel/42704https://www.idnes.cz/auto/zpravodajstvi/lide-nechapou-autonomni-auta-podpora-od-ajtaku-tomu-nepomuze.A161127_211248_automoto_vokhttps://www.autorevue.cz/pet-otazek-na-autonomni-rizeni-na-ktere-zatim-nikdo-nema-odpovedhttps://www.autorevue.cz/skupina-pravniku-chce-dostat-autonomni-vozy-na-ceske-silnicehttps://www.idnes.cz/ekonomika/doprava/autonomni-vozy-pojistovny-zmeny.A180611_095011_eko-doprava_jnhttps://www.idnes.cz/auto/zpravodajstvi/autonomni-vuz-roboticke-rizeni.A181120_181958_automoto_fdvhttps://zpravy.aktualne.cz/ekonomika/auto/plne-autonomni-auto-je-utopie-rika-sef-firmy-ktera-v-jejich/r~47ca921c13eb11e9a67dac1f6b220ee8/https://www.penize.cz/doprava/403271-ztratime-svobodu-ridit-autohttps://www.autorevue.cz/autonomni-vozidla-nejsou-tak-daleko-britanie-uz-muze-testovat-bez-ridicuhttps://www.autorevue.cz/kolona-autonomnich-vozu-v-cine-si-vyslouzila-svetovy-rekord-za-sebou-jelo-55-authttps://elektrickevozy.cz/clanky/jak-tesla-uci-sva-auta-aby-myslela-jako-lide#commentshttps://zpravy.aktualne.cz/ekonomika/auto/autonomni-auta-budou-lide-chtit-rozsiri-se-jako-mobily-veri/r~f9505e8211b911ea84260cc47ab5f122/https://www.idnes.cz/auto/zpravodajstvi/contridrom-autonomni-vuz-budoucnost-doprava-bezpecnost-mercedes.A190107_132452_automoto_tajhttps://www.idnes.cz/auto/zpravodajstvi/autonomni-auta-testovani-polygon-stribro-accolade.A200122_211235_automoto_fdvhttps://www.idnes.cz/auto/zpravodajstvi/autonomni-rizeni-ridic-deloitte-kpmg.A200210_115642_automoto_fdv

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.