Transactions on Transport Sciences 2020, 11(3):12-24

Speeding behaviour of adolescents and the image of a typical person who speeds

Sonja E. Forward
Swedish Road and Transport Research Institute, VTI, 581 95 Linköping, Sweden; sonja.forward@vti.se

The aim of this study was to increase our understanding of what motivates young people to take risks in traffic but also why young men are more likely to get involved in road crashes.

The participants aged 16-19 years (N=945) completed an online survey. The questions were influenced by the Theory of planned behaviour (TPB) and the Prototype willingness model (PWM) and included a scenario describing a person riding a moped at 65 km/h in an urban area, in which the speed limit was 50 km/h.

The results, using a regression analysis, showed that a model which explained their willingness to speed was slightly better than a model explaining their intention. The best predictor, according to the beta weights in both models, was that it was "fun". However, this variable was more important in explaining their willingness than their intention. Other similar factors describing emotions with immediate rewards were also significantly more important in the prediction of willingness than intention.

When analysing the willingness to speed amongst young men and women, the results presented both similar and different results. Both were heavily influenced by a belief that it would be "fun". However, only young men also believed that it would impress others and that it would make them popular. Young women on the other hand did not believe that the behaviour was particularly boylike which could explain why they could identify with a person who sped.

The conclusion, from this study, is that speeding can be described as a reactive behaviour, but it could not be ruled out that it also can be planned. Based on the results from this study it is concluded that TPB would benefit from the inclusion of PWM variables.

Keywords: Prototype willingness model, Theory of planned behaviour, risk perception, young drivers, speeding, gender.

Received: February 7, 2020; Accepted: May 8, 2020; Prepublished online: May 8, 2020; Published: December 17, 2020  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Forward, S.E. (2020). Speeding behaviour of adolescents and the image of a typical person who speeds. Transactions on Transport Sciences, 11(3), 12-24
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50: 179-211. Go to original source...
    2. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2005). The influence of attitudes on behaviour. In D. Albarracín, B. T. Johnson & M. P. Zanna (Red.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 173-221). Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    3. Albarracín, D., Fishbein, M., Johnson, B. T., & Muellerleile, P. A. (2001). Theories of reasoned action and planned behaviour as models of condom use: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 142-161. Go to original source...
    4. Arata, C. M., Stafford, J., & Tims, M. S. (2003). High school drinking and its consequences. Adolescence, 38, 567-579
    5. Berg, J., Forward, S., & Holgersson, S. (2008). Unga på moped - en studie av riskgrupper och riktade polisinsatser för att motverka trimning (Young moped riders - a study of risk-taking and methods used by the police to reduce trimming). VTI rapport 631. Linköping: Statens väg- och transportforskningsinstitut.
    6. Banse, R., Gawronski, B., Rebetez, C., Gutt, H., & Morton, J. B. (2010). The development of spontaneous gender stereotyping in childhood. Relations to stereotype knowledge and stereotype flexibility. Developmental Science, 13, 298-306. Go to original source...
    7. Blanton, H., Gibbons, F. X., Gerrard, M., Conger, K. J., & Smith, G. E. (1997). The role of family and peers in the development of prototypes associated with substance use. Journal of Family Psychology, 11(3), 271-288. Go to original source...
    8. Bogaert, A.F., & Fisher, W.A. (1995). Predictors of university men´s number of sexual partners. Journal of Sex Research, 32, 119-130. Go to original source...
    9. Campbell, B. C., Dreber, A., Apicella, C. L., Eisenberg, D. T., Gray, P. B., Little, A. C., Garcia, J. R., Zamore, R. S., & Lum, J. K. (2010). Testosterone exposure, dopaminergic reward, and sensation-seeking in young men. Physiology & Behavior, 99, 451-456. Go to original source...
    10. Cestac, J., Paran, F., & Delhomme, P. (2011). Young drivers' sensation seeking, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control and their roles in predicting speeding intention: How risk-taking motivations evolve with gender and driving experience. Safety Science, 49, 424-432. Go to original source...
    11. Cordellieri, P., Baralla, F., Ferlazzo, F., Sgalla, R., Piccardi, L., & Giannini, A. M. (2016). Gender effects in young road users on road safety attitudes, behaviors and risk perception. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article number 1412. Go to original source...
    12. Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 98-104. Go to original source...
    13. de Almeida, R. M., Cabral, J. C., & Narvaes, R. (2015). Behavioural, hormonal and neurobiological mechanisms of aggressive behaviour in human and nonhuman primates. Physiology & Behavior, 143, 121-135. Go to original source...
    14. DeJoy, D. M. (1992). An examination of gender differences in traffic accident risk perception. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 24, 237-246. Go to original source...
    15. Duke, S. A., Balzer, B. W., & Steinbeck, K. S. (2014). Testosterone and its effects on human male adolescent mood and behavior: a systematic review. Journal of Adolescent Health, 55, 315-322. Go to original source...
    16. Eisenegger, C., Haushofer, J., & Fehr, E. (2011). The role of testosterone in social interaction. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 263-271. Go to original source...
    17. Elliott, M. A., McCartan, R., Brewster, S. E., Coyle, D., Emerson, L., & Gibson, K. (2017). An application of the prototype willingness model to drivers' speeding behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 735-747. Go to original source...
    18. Engström, I. (2008). Young drivers and their passengers - Crash risk and group processes (Dissertation Linköping Studies in Behavioural Science No 135). Linköpings Universitet.
    19. Falk, B., & Montgomery, H. (2007). Developing traffic safety intervention from conceptions of risks and accidents. Transportation Research Part F, 10, 412-427. Go to original source...
    20. Farrow, J. A., & Brissing, P. (1990). Risk for DWI: A new look at gender differences in drinking and driving influences, experiences, and attitudes among new adolescent drivers. Health Education Quarterly, 17, 213.221. Go to original source...
    21. Fausto-Sterling, A. (1992). Myths of Gender: Biological Theories About Men and Women. Revised edition. Basic books, New York.
    22. Ferguson, S., Williams, A., Chapline, J., Reinfurt, D., & De Leonardis, D. (2001). Relationship of parent driving records to the driving records of their children. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 33, 229-234. Go to original source...
    23. Fine, C. (2017). Testosterone Rex: Unmaking the myths of our gendered minds. Icon Books Ltf, UK.
    24. Geber, S., Baumann, E., & Klimmt, C. (2016). Tailoring in risk communication by linking risk profiles and communication preferences: The case of speeding of young car drivers. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 97, 315-325. Go to original source...
    25. Gerrad, M., Gibbons, F. X., Houlihan, A. E., Stock, M. L., & Pomery, E. A. (2008). A dual-process approach to health risk decision making - The prototype willingness model. Developmental Review, 28, 29-61. Go to original source...
    26. Gerrard, M., Gibbons, F. X., Benthin, A. C., & Hessling, R. M. (1996). The reciprocal nature of risk behaviors and cognitions: What you think shapes what you do and vice versa. Health Psychology, 15, 344-354. Go to original source...
    27. Gerrard, M., Gibbons, F. X., Reis-Bergan, M., Trudeau, L., Vande Lune, L. S., & Buunk, B. (2002). Inhibitory effects of drinker and nondrinker prototypes on adolescent alcohol consumption. Health Psychology, 21, 601-609. Go to original source...
    28. Gibbons, F. X., Gerrad, M., Blanton, H., & Russell, D. W. (1998). Reasoned action and social reaction: Willingness and intention as independent predictors of health risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1164-1181. Go to original source...
    29. Gibbons, F. X., Houlihan A. E., & Gerrard M. (2009). Reason and reaction: the utility of a dual-focus, dual-processing perspective on promotion and prevention of adolescent health risk behavior. British Journal of Health Psychology,14, 231-48. Go to original source...
    30. Gogtay, N., & Geidd, J. N. (2004). Dynamic mapping of human cortical development during childhood through early adulthood. http://www.pnas.org/content/101/21/8174.abstract. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
    31. Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime, Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press. Go to original source...
    32. Grace, D. M., David, B. J., & Ryan, M.K. (2008). Investigating preschoolers' categorical thinking about gender through imitation, attention, and the use of self-categories. Child Development, 79, 1928-1941. Go to original source...
    33. Gregersen, N. P. (2010). Nollvision för tonåringar i trafiken Utopi eller möjlighet? NTF, Stockholm.
    34. Grube, J. W., & Voas, R. B. (1996). Predicting underage drinking and driving behaviors. Addiction, 91,1843-57. Go to original source...
    35. Guggenheim, N., & Taubman-Ben-Ari, O. (2015). Can friendship serve as an impetus for safe driving among young drivers? Transportation Research Part F, 30, 145-152. Go to original source...
    36. Harré, N., Field, J., & Kirkwood, B. (1996). Gender differences and areas of common concern in the driving behaviors and attitudes of adolescents. Journal of Safety Research, 27, 163-173. Go to original source...
    37. Hassan, H. M., & Abdel-Aty, M. A. (2013). Exploring the safety implications of young drivers' behavior, attitudes and perceptions. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 50, 361-370. Go to original source...
    38. Horvath, C., Lewis, I., & Watson, B. (2012). The beliefs which motivate young male and female drivers to speed: A comparison of low and high intenders. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 45, 334-341. Go to original source...
    39. Iversen, H. (2004). Risk-taking attitudes and risky driving behaviour. Transportation Research Part F, 7, 135-150, Go to original source...
    40. Knight, P.J., Iverson, D., & Harris, M.F. (2013). The perceptions of young rural drivers in NSW, Australia of speeding and associated risk: A mixed methods study. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 55, 172 - 177. Go to original source...
    41. Mayhew, D. R., Simpson, H. M. & Pak, A. (2003). Changes in collision rates among novice drivers during the first months of driving. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 35, 683-691. Go to original source...
    42. Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative Dimensions of Adult Learning. San Francisco. Oxford: Jossey-Bass Publishers. Go to original source...
    43. Mohamed, M., & Bromfield, N. (2017). Attitudes, Driving Behavior, and Accident Involvement Among Young Male Drivers in Saudi Arabia. Transportation Research Part F, 47, 59-71 Go to original source...
    44. Moore, S., & Gullone, E. (1996). Predicting adolescent risk behaviour using a personalised costbenefit analysis. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 25, 343-359. Go to original source...
    45. Oltedal S., & Rundmo T. (2006). The effects of personality and gender on risky driving behaviour and accident involvement. Safety Science, 44, 621-628. Go to original source...
    46. Oscar Oviedo-Trespalacios, O., & Scott-Parker, B. (2018). Fast and furious: A neglected issue in health promotion among young drivers. Health Promotion Journal of Australia, 30, 311-316. Go to original source...
    47. Parker, D., Manstead, A.S.R., Stradling, S.G., & Reason, J.T. (1992). Determinants of Intentions to Commit Driving Violations. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 24, 117-134. Go to original source...
    48. Parsons, J.T., Siegel, A.W., & Cousins, J.H. (1997). Late adolescent risk-taking: Effects of perceived benefits and perceived risks on behavioral intentions and behavioral change. Journal of Adolescence, 20, 381-392. Go to original source...
    49. Rivis A., Sheeran, P., & Armitage, CJ. (2006). Augmenting the theory of planned behaviour with the prototype/willingness model: predictive validity of actor versus abstainer prototypes for adolescents' health-protective and health-risk intentions. British Journal of Health Psychology, 11, 483-500. Go to original source...
    50. Rowe, R., Andrews, E., Harris, P. R., Armitage, C. J., McKenna, F. K., & Norman, P. (2016). Identifying beliefs underlying pre-drivers' intentions to take risks: An application of the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Accident Analysis & Prevention,89, 49-56. Go to original source...
    51. Rueda-Domingo, T., Lardelli-Claret, P., de Dios Luna-del-Castillo, J., Jiménez- Moleón, J. J., García-Martín, M., & Bueno-Cavanillas, A. (2004). The influence of passengers on the risk of the driver causing a car collision in Spain. Analysis of collisions from 1990 to 1999. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 36, 481-489. Go to original source...
    52. Scott-Parker, B. Watson, B., & King, M. J. (2009). Understanding the psychosocial factors influencing the risky behaviour of young drivers. Transportation Research Part F, 12, 470-482. Go to original source...
    53. Shope, J. T., & Bingham, C. R. (2008). Teen Driving: Motor-Vehicle Crashes and Factors That Contribute. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35, 261-71. Go to original source...
    54. Simons-Morton. B. G., Quimet, M. C., Chen, R., Klauer, S. G., Lee, S. E., Wang., & Dingus, T. A. (2012). Peer influence predicts speeding prevalence among teenage drivers. Journal of Safety Research, 43, 397-403. Go to original source...
    55. Stainton Rogers, W. (2003). Social Psychology: Experimental and critical approaches. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
    56. Summala, H. (1996). Accident risk and driver behaviour. Safety Science. 22, 103-117. Go to original source...
    57. Taubman - Ben-Ari, O., Kaplan, S., Lotan, T., & Prato, C, G. (2015). Parents' and peers' contribution to risky driving of male teen drivers. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 78, 81-86. Go to original source...
    58. Vollrath, M., Meilinger, T., & Krüger, H.-P. (2002). How the presence of passengers influences the risk of a collision with another vehicle. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 34, 649-654. Go to original source...
    59. Watters, S. E., & Beck, K. H. (2016). A qualitative study of college students' perceptions of risky driving and social influences. Traffic Injury Prevention, 17, 122.127. Go to original source...
    60. Waylen, A., & McKenna, F. (2002). Cradle attitudes - grave consequences. University of Reading. UK.
    61. Weston, L., & Hellier, E. (2018). Designing road safety interventions for young drivers - The power of peer influence. Transportation Research Part F, 55, 262-271. Go to original source...
    62. Whissell, R. W., & Bigelow, B. J. (2003). The speeding attitude scale and the role of sensation seeking in profiling young drivers at risk. Risk Analysis, 23, 811-820. Go to original source...
    63. Worchel, S. Rothgerber, H., Day, E. A., Hart, D., & Butemeyer, J. (1998). Social identity and individual productivity within groups. British Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 389-414. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content