Transactions on Transport Sciences 2018, 9(2):35-41 | DOI: 10.5507/tots.2018.010

Drunk driving prevention and cultural influences: the SAFE ROADS 4 YOUTH (SR4Y) project

Dr. Jean-Pascal Assailly, Dr. Julien Cestac
IFSTTAR, Allée des marroniers, 78000, Satory, France

Driving under the influence of alcohol is an important factor in road fatalities all over the world. However, an important significant heterogeneity among countries was found regarding this issue. Why is such a discrepancy found among countries? Several specificities might explain the differences, such as enforcement practices, cultural values, or drinking patterns. The aim of this study was to test whether the social influence (descriptive and injunctive norms) on drunk driving is country-dependent and to explore whether the differences can be attributed to the contextual and/or cultural specificities of the countries.

We used data from the SAFE ROADS 4 YOUTH (SR4Y) project, with the objective to implement and evaluate drink driving prevention actions using a common conceptual framework in three developing countries over three continents: Vietnam, South Africa and Argentina. 11300 students aged between 13 and 25 were surveyed.

We conducted a regression analysis of social norms on the intention to resist to drunk driving in each country. In all three countries, family injunctive norms were correlated with drunk-driving (DD) intention. The link was strongest in Argentina and weakest in South Africa. In South Africa, friends' injunctive norms had negligible link with DD intention, no link was found with friends' descriptive norms. The link between injunctive norms and DD intention was stronger in Vietnam than in Argentina. Friends' descriptive norms had stronger link with DD in Argentina than in Vietnam.

Overall these results suggest differences in social influence on drunk driving intention depending on national cultures.

Keywords: Alcohol; culture; young people; drinking and driving; risk perception; norms

Received: March 27, 2018; Accepted: November 8, 2018; Prepublished online: November 8, 2018; Published: December 22, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Jean-Pascal Assailly, D., & Julien Cestac, D. (2018). Drunk driving prevention and cultural influences: the SAFE ROADS 4 YOUTH (SR4Y) project. Transactions on Transport Sciences, 9(2), 35-41. doi: 10.5507/tots.2018.010
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Ando, K., Ohnuma, S., & Chang, E. C. (2007). Comparing normative influences as determinants of environmentally conscious behaviours between the USA and Japan. Asian Journal Of Social Psychology, 10(3), 171-178. Go to original source...
    2. Antonopoulos, C. N., Germeni, E., Bacopoulou, F., Kalapoki, V., Maltezos, S., Skalkidis, I., Petridou, E. (2011). Assessing the impact of risk-taking behavior on road crash involvementamong university students residing in two Mediterranean countries. Safety Science, 49,933-938. Go to original source...
    3. Assailly, J.-P. (2011). The psychology of risk. New York: Nova Science, 291 p.
    4. Brown, S. L. (1998). Associations between peer drink driving, peer attitudes toward drink driving, and personal drink driving. Journal Of Applied Social Psychology, 28(5), 423-436. Go to original source...
    5. Cestac, J., Delhomme, P., & Paran, F. (2014). Drive as I say, not as I do: influence of injunctive and descriptive norms combination on speeding intention among young drivers. Transportation research part F, 23, 44-56. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2013.12.006. Go to original source...
    6. Cestac, J., Kraïem, S., & Assailly, J-P. (2016). Cultural values and random breath tests as moderators of the social influence on drunk driving in 15 countries. Journal of Safety Research, 56, 89-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2015.12.001 Go to original source...
    7. Chow, G., 1960. Test of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions. Econometrica, 28 (3), 591-605. Go to original source...
    8. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    9. Curran, P. J., Stice, E., Chassin, L. (1997). The relation between adolescent alcohol use and peer alcohol use: A longitudinal random coefficients model. Journal Of Consulting And Clinical Psychology, 65(1), 130-140. Go to original source...
    10. Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51(3), 629-636. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0046408. Go to original source...
    11. Ecorys (2014). Study on the prevention of drink-driving by the use of alcohol interlock devices. Final Report Rotterdam 18.2.2014.
    12. Engel, R. (2007). Social and cultural factors. TRACE report D5.4. 46 p. Retrieved from http://www.trace-project.org/publication/archives/trace-wp5-d5-4.pdf
    13. Fernandes, R., Hatfield, J., & Soames Job, R. F. (2010). A systematic investigation of the differential predictors for speeding, drink-driving, driving while fatigued, and not wearing a seat belt, among young drivers. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology And Behaviour, 13(3), 179-196. Go to original source...
    14. Forward, S. (2009). The theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive norms and past behaviour in the prediction of drivers' intentions to violate. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 12(3), 198-207. Go to original source...
    15. Gazis, N., Connor, J. P., Ho, R. (2009). Cultural identity and peer influence as predictors of substance use among culturally diverse Australian adolescents. The Journal Of Early Adolescence, 30(3), 345-368. Go to original source...
    16. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    17. Hofstede, G., Hofstede G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. Revised and Expanded 3rd Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    18. Houwing, S., Hagenzieker, M., Mathijssen, R., Bernholf, I. M., Hels, T., Janstrup, K., Verstraete, A. (2011). Prevalence of alcohol and other psychoactive substances in drivers in general traffic. Part I: General Results (Project N°TREN-05-FP6TR-S07. 61320-518404-DRUID, Deliverable D2.2.3.). Retrieved from DRUID Reports http://www.druid-project.eu/cln_031/nn_107534/Druid/EN/deliverales-list/deliverables
    19. International Transport Forum (2018). Alcohol-related road casualties in official crash statistics. Paris: OECD Publications.
    20. Larimer, M., Turner, A., Mallett, K., Geisner, I. (2004). Predicting drinking behavior and alcohol-related problems among fraternity and sorority members: examining the role of descriptive and injunctive norms. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 18(3), 203-212. Go to original source...
    21. Özkan, T., Lajunen, T., Chliaoutakis, J. E., Parker, D., Summala (2006). Cross-cultural differences in driving behaviours : a comparison of six countries. Transportation Research Part F, 9,227-242. Go to original source...
    22. Room, R. (2001). Intoxication and bad behavior: understanding cultural differences in the link. Social Science & Medicine, 53(2), 189-198. Go to original source...
    23. Safe roads for youth (2015). https://www.saferoads4youth.net
    24. Stok, F., Ridder, D. D., Vet, E., Wit, J. F. (2014). Don't tell me what I should do, but what others do: The influence of descriptive and injunctive peer norms on fruit consumption in adolescents. British Journal of Health Psychology, 19(1), 52-6. Go to original source...
    25. Warner, H. W., Özkan, T., Lajunen, T., Tzamalouka, G. (2011). Cross-cultural comparison of drivers' tendency to commit different aberrant driving behaviours. Transportation Research Part F, 14,390-399. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content