Transactions on Transport Sciences 2017, 8(1):44-57 | DOI: 10.5507/tots.2017.007

Cycling and designing for cyclists in Germany: Road safety, Guidelines and Research

Benjamin Schreck
Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt) Bergisch Gladbach, Germany

Cycling is considered a social, eco-friendly, pollution-free, low noise and healthy activity and mode of transportation. The socially and politically desired increase of attractiveness and promotion of cycle traffic is expected to shift the modal split towards non-motorized traffic. This could contribute towards a more environment-friendly mobility. There are currently around 70 million bicycles including 2.5 million electrically assisted bicycles (pedelecs) in Germany. This number is expected to increase in the near future with greater use of electromotive assisted bicycles. The changes in cycle use, the increasing use of electrically assisted cycles and raised specific requirements e.g. on quality of traffic flow will require modifications to infrastructure in terms of cycle planning, cycle conception, road construction and maintenance. This article presents an overview and selected current topics in the field of road safety based on German national accident statistics. The data will be compared with the accident statistics of other European countries. In this context of high accident numbers, high accident severity, and the rising share of bicycle accidents, it will be necessary to initiate further and more effective interdisciplinary research activities. Otherwise the development of cycling safety might become decoupled from the positive improvements in overall traffic safety. Following a general summary of guidelines for road design and cycling facilities, this article shows the development of interdisciplinary research activities and offers an extract of the current and completed cyclist safety research projects in the areas of behaviour, infrastructure, safety equipment and vehicle technology in Germany.

Keywords: Accidents, Cycle traffic, Design Guidelines, Interdisciplinary Research, Safety Programm.

Accepted: April 25, 2017; Published: April 14, 2017  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Schreck, B. (2017). Cycling and designing for cyclists in Germany: Road safety, Guidelines and Research. Transactions on Transport Sciences8(1), 44-57. doi: 10.5507/tots.2017.007
Download citation

References

  1. Alrutz, D., Bohle, W., & Busek, S. (2015). Nutzung von Radwegen in Gegenrichtung - Sicherheitsverbesserungen [Use of cycle paths in opposite direction - Improvements of safety]. BASt Report V 261. Bergisch Gladbach. Retrieved from http://bast.opus.hbz-nrw.de/volltexte/2015/1610/pdf/V261_barrierefreies_Internet_PDF.pdf
  2. Alrutz, D., Bohle, W., Hacke, U., Lohmann, G., & Friedrich, N. (2015). Potenzielle Einfluesse von Pedelecs auf die Verkehrssicherheit [Potential influences of Pedelecs on road safety]. Report. Hannover und Darmstadt. Retrieved from http://edoc.difu.de/edoc.php?id=QLIFVXN7
  3. Baier, R., Schuckließ, W., Jachtmann, Y., Diegmann, V., Mahlau, & A., Gaessler, G. (2013). Radpotenziale im Stadtverkehr [Potentials of cycling in urban traffic]. BASt Report V 227. Bergisch Gladbach. Retrieved from http://bast.opus.hbz-nrw.de/volltexte/2013/697/pdf/V227b.pdf
  4. Baier, R., Leu, P., & Rittershaus, J. (2015). Fuehrung des Radverkehrs an Landstraßen [Management of cycling on rural roads]. Report FE 21.0055/2013. Unpublished. Aachen. Go to original source...
  5. Von Below, A. (2016). Verkehrssicherheit von Radfahrern - Analyse sicherheitsrelevanter Motive, Einstellungen und Verhaltensweisen [Road safety of cyclists: Analysis of motives relevant for security, settings and behaviour patterns]. BASt Report M 264. Bergisch Gladbach. Retrieved from http://bast.opus.hbz-nrw.de/frontdoor.php?source_opus=1663&la=de
  6. BMVI (2011). Road Safety Programme 2011. English Translation. Retrieved from http://www.bmvi.de/SharedDocs/EN/Documents/LA/road-safety-programme-2011.pdf?__blob=publicationFile
  7. BMVI (2012). National Cycling Plan 2020. English Translation. Retrieved from http://edoc.difu.de/edoc.php?id=1u032rd6
  8. BMVI (2015). Mid-Term Review of the 2011-2020 Road Safety Programme. English Translation. Retrieved from http://www.bmvi.de/SharedDocs/EN/publications/mid-term-review-of-the-2011-2020-road-safety-programme.pdf?__blob=publicationFile
  9. European Commission. Statistics - accidents data. CARE. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/transport/road_safety/specialist/statistics/index_en.htm
  10. Federal Statistical Office (2014). Verkehr - Verkehrsunfaelle, 2013 [Traffic - Traffic Accidents]. Retrieved from Federal Statistical Office: https://www.destatis.de/DE/Publikationen/Thematisch/TransportVerkehr/Verkehrsunfaelle
  11. Federal Statistical Office (2016). Verkehr - Verkehrsunfaelle, 2015 [Traffic - Traffic Accidents]. Retrieved from Federal Statistical Office: https://www.destatis.de/DE/Publikationen/Thematisch/TransportVerkehr/Verkehrsunfaelle
  12. Follmer, R. (2011). Mobilitaet in Deutschland - Fahrradnutzung [Mobility in Germany - Bicycle use]. Presentation. Retrieved from http://www.mobilitaet-in-deutschland.de/pdf/MiD_2008_Fahrrad_Impulsvortrag.pdf
  13. Follmer, R., Kunert, U., Kloas, J.,& Kuhfeld, H. (2004). Mobilitaet in Deutschland 2004 [Mobility in Germany]. Bonn and Berlin. Retrieved from http://www.mobilitaet-in-deutschland.de/pdf/ergebnisbericht_mid_ende_144_punkte.pdf
  14. Follmer, R., Gruschwitz, D., Jesske, B., Quand, S., Lenz, B., Nobis, C., Köhler, K., Mehlin, M. (2010). Mobilitaet in Deutschland [Mobility in Germany] 2008. Bonn und Berlin. Retrieved from http://www.mobilitaet-in-deutschland.de/pdf/MiD2008_Abschlussbericht_I.pdf
  15. German Road and Transportation Research Association (FGSV 2010). Empfehlungen für Radverkehrsanlagen (ERA) [Recommendations for cycle facilities]. Cologne.
  16. German Road and Transportation Research Association (FGSV 2012). Guidelines for the Design of Urban Roads 2006 (RASt 2006). Edition 2006 - English Translation 2009.
  17. German Road and Transportation Research Association (FGSV 2013). Richtlinien für die Anlage von Landstraßen (RAL 2012) [Guidelines for the design of rural roads]. Cologne.
  18. Huetter, A. (2013). Verkehr auf einen Blick [Traffic of one view]. Federal Statistical Office. Wiesbaden. Retrieved from https://www.destatis.de/DE/Publikationen/Thematisch /TransportVerkehr/Querschnitt/BroschuereVerkehrBlick0080006139004.pdf?__blob=publicationFile
  19. Institute for Applied Social Science Research (INFAS) and the Institute of Transport Research of the German Aerospace Center (DLR) (2010). Mobilitaet in Deutschland 2008 [Mobility in Germany]. Bonn and Berlin.
  20. Richter, T., Karrer-Gauß, K., Sachs, J., Schreiber, A., Schreiber, M. (2014). Toter Winkel - Konflikt zwischen rechtsabbiegenden Lkw und geradeausfahrendem Radverkehr [Blind spot - Conflicts between right turning trucks and straight on going bicycles], Report FE 82.512/2010. Unpublished. Berlin.
  21. Schleinitz, K., Franke-Bartholdt, L., Petzoldt, T., Schwanitz, S., Gehlert, T., & Kuehn, M. (2014). Pedelec-Naturalistic Cycling Study. German Insurers Accident Research. Berlin. Retrieved from http://udv.de/de/publikationen/forschungsberichte/pede lec-naturalistic-cycling-study
  22. Schiller, C., Zimmermann, F., & Bohle, W. (2011). Hochrechnungsmodell von Stichprobenzaehlungen für den Radverkehr [Extrapolations model of random sampling for cycling]. Dresden. Retrieved from http://www.forschungsinformationssystem.de/servlet/is/375673/
  23. Schreck, B., & Poeppel-Decker, M. (2014). Unfallgeschehen zwischen rechtsabbiegenden Gueterkraftfahrzeugen und geradeausfahrenden Radfahrern [Accident occurrence between trucks turning right and cyclists riding straight]. Report. Bergisch Gladbach.
  24. Schreck, B., & Seiniger, P. (2015). Abbiege-Assistenzsystem für Lkw [Driver assistance system for trucks]. BASt Report F 104. Bergisch Gladbach. Retrieved from http://bast.opus.hbz-nrw.de/frontdoor.php?source_opus=1222&la=de

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.