Transactions on Transport Sciences 2014, 7(3):91-96 | DOI: 10.2478/trans-2014-0006

South Moravian Mobility Study Basic Findings and Comparison with German Data

P. Malina*, P. Kouøil, P. ©enk
Transport Research Centre, Brno, Czech Republic

Transport planning in the Czech Republic faces the problem of a lack of data on travel behaviour. The paper deals with the usability of foreign travel behaviour data for transport modelling in the Czech Republic. The authors present their findings on the example of a comparison between the results from the data analysis of a travel demand survey in the South Moravian region, which was performed in 2013 on the sample of 1000 households and a German survey Mobilität in Deutschland.

Keywords: Travel behaviour, South Moravian region, transport planning.

Published: September 1, 2014  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Malina, P., Kouøil, P., & ©enk, P. (2014). South Moravian Mobility Study Basic Findings and Comparison with German Data. Transactions on Transport Sciences7(3), 91-96. doi: 10.2478/trans-2014-0006
Download citation

References

  1. Braun Kohlová, M., ©kopková, H., Urban, J., 2007. Analýza ka¾dodenního dopravního chování dospìlého mìstského obyvatelstva a nástroje regulace dopravy: Sbìr existujících dat o dopravním chování 1.2 k projektu MD24/2006-430-OPI/3 z OP "Infrastruktura" - Priorita 2 (2.4) [online]. Praha: Univerzita Karlova v Praze, Centrum pro otázky ¾ivotního prostøedí [cited 2014-05-26]. 20 p. (in Czech)
  2. Cinzia, C., 2010. Automobile ownership model [online]. The National Centre for Smart Growth Research and Education at the University of Maryland [cited 2014-05-22]. Retrieved from: http://smartgrowth.umd.edu/assets/tprg/a1.pdf
  3. de Jong, G., Fox, J., Pieters, M., Daly, A.J., Smith, R., 2004. A comparison of car ownership models. Transport Reviews [online]. 24 (4), pp. 397-408 [cited 2014-05-26]. ISSN 1464-5327. Retrieved from: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/2467/2/pITS2116-A_comparison_of_car_ownership_modelsv4.pdf?origin=publication_detail Go to original source...
  4. Fellendorf, M., Herry, M., Karmasin, H., Klementschitz, R., Kohla, B., Meschik, M., Rehrl, K., Reiter, T., Sammer, G., Schneider, C., Sedlacek, N., Tomschy, R., Wolf, E., 2011. KOMOD - Konzeptstudie Mobilitätsdaten Österreichs: Handbuch für Mobilitätserhebungen.
  5. Follmer, R., Gruschwitz, D., Jesske, B., Quandt, S., Nobis, C., Köhler, K., 2010. Mobilität in Deutschland 2008 - Tabellenband [online]. Bonn: Infas Institut für angewandte Sozialwissenschaft GmbH; Berlin: Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. Institut für Verkehrsforschung [cited 2014-05-22]. Retrieved from: http://www.mobilitaet-in-deutschland.de/pdf/MiD2008_Tabellenband.pdf
  6. Institut für Verkehrs- und Infrastrukturforschung GmbH, 2009. The New KONTIV Design [online]. [cited 2014-05-27]. Retrieved from: http://www.socialdata.de/info/KONTIV_engl.pdf
  7. Karasmaa, N., 2003. The Transferability of Travel Demand Models: An analysis of transfer methods, data quality and model estimation. Dissertation paper [online]. Helsinki: Helsinki University of Technology, p. 3 [cited 2014-05-27]. Retrieved from: http://lib.tkk.fi/Diss/2003/isbn9512268574/isbn9512268574.pdf
  8. Mohammadian, A., Zhang, Y., 2007. Investigating the Transferability of National Household Travel Survey Data. In TRB Conference, Washington, D.C., USA, 2007 [online], p. 13 [cited 2014-05-22]. Retrieved from: http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/archive/committees/AB000/1/07-2030.pdf
  9. Schönfelder, S., Axhausen, K.W., 2010. Urban Rhythms and Travel Behavior. MPG Books Group UK. ISBN 97807546751150.
  10. Stopher, P.R., Greaves, S.P., Xu, M., 2004. Using Nationwide Household Travel Data for Simulating Metropolitan Area Household Travel Data. In TRB Conference, Washington, D.C., USA, 2004 [online]. [cited 2014-05-26]. Retrieved from: http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/archive/conferences/nhts/Xu.pdf Timur, 2014 [online].
  11. Týmová iniciativa pro místní udr¾itelný rozvoj, o. p. s. [cited 2014-05- 26]. Retrieved from: http://www.timur.cz/indikatory/mobilita-a-mistni-preprava-cestujicich-2.html (in Czech)
  12. U.S. DOT Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, 2005. Summary Report for the Peer Exchange on Data Transferability: TRB Committees ABJ30, ADB10 and ABJ10 [online]. Washington, D.C., 2005 [cited 2014-05-26]. Retrieved from: http://www.edthefed.com/xferability/articles/tmip_data_transferability_peer.pdf
  13. Vachtl, M., Melzer, Z., Nìmec, T., Urbánková, P., Koke¹, O., Dytrych, J., 2012. Dopravní sektorová strategie 2. fáze - Kniha 2 Strategický dopravní model ÈR [online], pp.15 [cited 2014-05-26]. Retrieved from: http://www.dopravnistrategie.cz/images/projekt/ke-stazeni/Kniha2-SV121116CS.pdf (in Czech)
  14. Yu, H., Shaw, S.L., 2004. Representing and Visualizing Travel Diary Data: A Spatio- temporal GIS Approach. In ESRI International User Conference, San Diego, CA, USA, 2004 [online]. [cited 2014-05-26]. Retrieved from: http://proceedings.esri.com/library/userconf/proc04/docs/pap1258.pdf

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.