Transactions on Transport Sciences 2011, 4(4):193-198 | DOI: 10.2478/v10158-011-0017-5

Geographical Location of Depopulation Areas in the Czech Republic and its Dependence on Transport Infrastructure Part II: Case Studies

E. Drápela*
Transport Research Centre, Brno, Czech Republic

Location of settlement in important routes of transport was always one of the key factors of its prosperity. However, in the car-oriented world of today the distance factor is not so important for many people and they prefer to live in calm rural areas. Simultaneously, many rural areas in peripheral locations are affected by the emigration of inhabitants and global decay. This study explains how good transport infrastructure should be beneficial for rural areas and how it is in reality in the Czech Republic. The study is part of a larger body of research, based on the component analysis of the localization of depopulation areas in the Czech Republic over the years 1869 - 2010. The role of transport is documented, not only by the localization of transport infrastructure, but also by the duration and orientation of the commute to work. Theories and premises are supported by quantitative analysis in all municipalities in the Czech Republic and also by three in-depth case studies, oriented more on qualitative indicators.

Keywords: transport geography, regional development, depopulation areas, transport infrastructure, mobility.

Published: December 1, 2011  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Drápela, E. (2011). Geographical Location of Depopulation Areas in the Czech Republic and its Dependence on Transport Infrastructure Part II: Case Studies. Transactions on Transport Sciences4(4), 193-198. doi: 10.2478/v10158-011-0017-5
Download citation

References

  1. Andreoli, M. (1992). An analysis of different kinds of marginal systems in a developed country: the case of Italy. In: Occasional Papers in Geography and Planning, 4, pp. 24 - 44.
  2. Čermák, L. (2005). Hodnocení vztahu dopravní dostupnosti a exponovanosti území. In: Novotná, M. (ed.) Problémy periferních oblastí. PřF UK, Praha, pp. 44 - 52. ISBN 80- 86561-21-6
  3. Drápela, E. (2009). Application of spatial mobility research as a tool for site planning on a micro-regional level. In: Transactions on Transport Sciences, 2 (3), pp. 86-93. ISSN 1802-971X. Go to original source...
  4. Drápela, E. (2010). Marginální oblasti na území ČR a jejich vývoj v prostoru a čase. Masarykova univerzita, Brno, 221 p.
  5. Galante, E., Sala, C., 1987. Introduzione. In: Consiglio Nazionale di Ricerche (ed.) I sistemi agricoli marginali: rapporto intermedio. Roma: CNR, pp. 9 - 31.
  6. Giddens, A., 1984. The constitution of society. Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity press, 440 p. ISBN 0-7456-0007-7
  7. Havlíček, T. and P. Chromý (2001). Příspěvek k teorii polarizovaného vývoje území se zaměřením na periferní oblasti. In: Geografie - sborník České geografické společnosti, 106 (1), pp. 1 - 11. ISSN 1212-0014 Go to original source...
  8. Jeřábek, M., J. Dokoupil and T. Havlíček et al. (2004). České pohraničí: bariéra nebo prostor zprostředkování? Academia, Praha, 296 p. ISBN 80-200-1051-3
  9. Leimgruber, W. (2004). Between Global and Local: Marginality and Marginal Regions in the Context of Globalization and Deregulation. Ashgate, Aldershot, 321 p. ISBN 0-7546- 3155-9
  10. Marada, M. (2001). Vymezení periferních oblastí a studium jejich znaků pomocí statistické analýzy. In: Geografie - sborník České geografické společnosti, 106 (1), pp. 12 - 25. ISSN 1212-0014 Go to original source...
  11. Mehretu, A. et al. (2002). Spatial shifts in production and consumption: marginality patterns in the new international division of labour. In: Jussila, H., R. Majoral and B. Cullen (eds.) Sustainable Development and Geographical Space - Issues of population, environment, globalization and education in marginal regions. Ashgate, Aldershot. ISBN 0-7546-1860- 9
  12. Musil, J. (1988). Nové pohledy na regeneraci našich měst a osídlení. In: Územní plánování a urbanismus, 15 (2), pp. 67 - 72.
  13. Musil, J. and J. Müller (2006). Vnitřní periferie České republiky, sociální soudržnost a sociální vyloučení. CESES FSV UK, Praha, 2/2006, 52 p. ISSN 1801-1640
  14. Musil, J. and J. Müller (2008). Inner Peripheries of the Czech Republic as a Form of Social Exclusion. In: Musil, J. (ed.) Space and Historical Time as Dimensions of Social Change. MATFYZPRESS, Prague, 158 p. ISBN 978-80-7378-071-5
  15. Řehák, S. (1979). Prostorová struktura obslužného systému hromadné osobní dopravy. PřF UJEP, Brno.
  16. Řehák, S. (2004). Geografický potenciál pohraničí. In: Jeřábek, M., J. Dokoupil and T. Havlíček et al. (2004). České pohraničí: bariéra nebo prostor zprostředkování? Academia, Praha, pp. 67 - 74. ISBN 80-200-1051-3
  17. Schmidt, M. (1998). An integrated systemic approach to marginal regions: from definition to development policies. In: Jussila, H., W. Leimgruber and R. Majoral (eds.) Perceptions of marginality. Theoretical issues and regional perceptions of marginality in geographical space. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp. 45 - 66. Go to original source...
  18. Tykkyläinen, M. (1998). From territorial marginality to marginality in cybersociety. In: Jussila, H., W. Leimgruber and R. Majoral (eds.) Perceptions of marginality. Theoretical issues and regional perceptions of marginality in geographical space. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp. 123-132. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.