Transactions on Transport Sciences 2010, 3(3):99-106 | DOI: 10.2478/v10158-010-0014-0

Interaction between Cyclist and Car during Broadside and Confrontation with Pedestrian Throw Formulas - Multibody Simulation

O. Fanta*,1, K. Jelen1, H. Purš2
1 Department of Anatomy and Biomechanics, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic
2 Advanced Engineering, s.r.o., CAE Dep., Prague, Czech Republic

Although the issue of the injury of a cyclist in car collision is in lower when compared to that of pedestrians, we cannot ignore it completely. There is an increasing need to pay attention to bicycle safety due to the growing popularity of motorless single-track vehicles. This study investigates whether it is appropriate to analyze cyclist accidents using relations describing pedestrian throws and whether using simulation software Madymo models the side-impact collision caused by cars. This paper also describes how significant the form of the front parts of normal cars are, as well as the position of the cyclist on three types of bicycles. The analysis of formulas which estimate the car's speed before the impact contributes mainly to the field of judicial expertise and the investigation of car accidents.

Keywords: Biomechanics, cycling, car accident, simulation software, throw distance.

Published: September 1, 2010  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Fanta, O., Jelen, K., & Purš, H. (2010). Interaction between Cyclist and Car during Broadside and Confrontation with Pedestrian Throw Formulas - Multibody Simulation. Transactions on Transport Sciences3(3), 99-106. doi: 10.2478/v10158-010-0014-0
Download citation

References

  1. Broker, Jeffrey and Hill, Paul. 2006. Bicycle Accidents: biomechanical, engineering, and legal aspects. Tucson : Lawyers & Judges Publishing Company, Inc., 2006. ISBN 0- 913875-90-2.
  2. Collins, J. C. and Morris, J. L. 1979. Accident Reconstruction. Highway Collision Analysis. 1979, pp. 240-242.
  3. Fugger, T., Randles, B. and Eubanks, J. J. 2000. Comparsion of Pedestrian and accident reconstruction model to experimental test data for wrap trajectories. ImechE Conference Transactions: Vehicle Safety. 2000, pp. 104-122.
  4. Limpert, R. 1999. Motor Vehicle Accident Reconstruction and Analysis. Charlotte : Michie Butterwoeth, 1999. Vol. Second Edition.
  5. Searle, J.A. and Searle, A. 1983. The trajectories of pedestrians, motorcycles, motorcyclists, etc. following a road accident. Proceedings of the 27th Stapp Car Crash Conference. 1983. Go to original source...
  6. Schmidt, D. N. and Nagel, D. A. 1971. Pedestrian Impact Case Study. Proceedings of 15th Conference Association for Automotive Medicine. 1971.
  7. Wood, D. P. 1997. Determination of speed from pedestrian throw In Forensic Accident Investigation: Motor Vehicles. Charlotte : Michie Butterworth, 1997.
  8. Bike Accident Summary, 2010. Traffic Operations. [Online] 01 19, Bike Accident Summary, 2010. [Cited: 02 25, 2010.] http://www.fcgov.com/traffic/pdf/bike_accident_summary.pdf.
  9. iBESIP. 2008. Používejte cyklistické přilby. iBESIP. [Online] 2008. [Cited: 1 9, 2010.] www.ibesip.cz/files/=220/Pouzivejte_cykl_prilby.doc.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.