Transactions on Transport Sciences 2025, 16(1):28-34 | DOI: 10.5507/tots.2024.021

A comprehensive examination of public transport user satisfaction in Indian megacities

Rupas Kumar Meesalaa*, b, M V Rajub
a. Department of Civil Engineering, Rajiv Gandhi University of Knowledge Technologies, Ongole Campus, Andhra Pradesh, India.
b. Department of Civil Engineering, Vignan's Foundation for Science, Technology, and Research (Deemed to be University), Vadlamudi, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India.

In recent times, traffic congestion has emerged as a persistent problem, critically affecting travel time, fuel consumption, and commuter stress, while also contributing to poor air quality and a reduced quality of life. This global problem is especially acute in Indian megacities, which have dense populations, massive vehicular fleet, and limited road space. Although public transport is considered a promising solution to traffic congestion and related emissions, the effectiveness and adoption of road public transport depend on the characteristics of the service. This study examines commuter satisfaction with public transport services in three Indian megacities (Bengaluru, Chennai, and Hyderabad), highlighting key factors influencing user perceptions. An online survey with 2,274 respondents, divided by location, gender and age group, was conducted from January to April 2023, assessing 12 service attributes. The present study shows varied perception levels of service attributes in the three selected cities. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed to reduce the dimensionality of the large dataset and confirm the robustness of the data, with high internal consistency across demographic variables using XLSTAT. Key factors identified in the study include ease of maintenance, accessibility, and affordability, with each city having its own strengths and weaknesses. The insights and findings of the current study provide valuable guidance for targeted improvements in public transportation systems to enhance commuter satisfaction and address the widespread problem of vehicular pollution and traffic congestion in Indian megacities.

Keywords: Public transport; user satisfaction; factor analysis; serviceability; public perception levels

Received: June 20, 2024; Revised: September 21, 2024; Accepted: October 8, 2024; Prepublished online: December 2, 2024; Published: April 26, 2025  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kumar Meesala, R., & Raju, M.V. (2025). A comprehensive examination of public transport user satisfaction in Indian megacities. Transactions on Transport Sciences, 16(1), 28-34. doi: 10.5507/tots.2024.021
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Adams, H. S., Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J., Colvile, R. N., Older, M. J., & Kendall, M. (2002). Assessment of road users' elemental carbon personal exposure levels, London, UK. Atmospheric Environment, 36, 5335-5342. Go to original source...
    2. Alalool, A., Alhashaikeh, B., Ibrahim, H., Majdalawi, R., & Ainawi, R. (2016). Traffic congestion and long driving hours: Impact on stress, emotional and physical health among drivers in Sharjah. Health Care: Current Reviews, 4.
    3. Badami, M. (2005). The urban transport challenge in India: Considerations, implications and strategies. International Development Planning Review, 27(2), 169-194. Go to original source...
    4. Bereitschaft, A. (2015). Pedestrian exposure to near-roadway PM2.5 in mixed-use urban corridors: A case study of Omaha, Nebraska. Sustainable Cities and Society, 15, 64-74. Go to original source...
    5. Bitkina, O. V., Kim, J., Park, J., Park, J., & Kim, H. K. (2019). Identifying traffic context using driving stress: A longitudinal preliminary case study. Sensors, 19(9), 2152. Go to original source...
    6. Boogaard, H., Borgman, F., Kamminga, J., & Hoek, G. (2009). Exposure to ultrafine and fine particles and noise during cycling and driving in 11 Dutch cities. Atmospheric Environment, 43(27), 4234-4242. Go to original source...
    7. Chaudhary, M. L. (2020). Commuters' Perceptions on Service Quality of Bus Rapid Transit Systems: Evidence from the Cities of Ahmedabad, Surat and Rajkot in India. European Transport, 79. Go to original source...
    8. De Nazelle, A., Seto, E., Donaire-Gonzalez, D., Mendez, M., Matamala, J., Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J., & Jerrett, M. (2013). Improving estimates of air pollution exposure through ubiquitous sensing technologies. Environmental pollution, 176, 92-99. Go to original source...
    9. Gertler, A. W. (2005). Diesel vs. gasoline emissions: Does PM from diesel or gasoline vehicles dominate in the US?. Atmospheric Environment, 39(13), 2349-2355. Go to original source...
    10. Ghosh, D., & Chattopadhyay, P. (2012). Application of principal component analysis (PCA) as a sensory assessment tool for fermented food products. Journal of food science and technology, 49, 328-334. Go to original source...
    11. INAE, (2019). Urban transportation-challenges & way forward. INAE forum on Civil Infrastructure-Traffic & Transportation. Retrieved from https://www.inae.in/storage/2020/01/Urban-Transportation.pdf
    12. Jaiswal, A., Jain, G., & Goswami, S. (2023). Assessment of Satisfaction Level for Existing Public Transport Systems using Machine Learning: A Case of Bhopal (India). European Transport, 93. Go to original source...
    13. Kaur, S., Nieuwenhuijsen, M., & Colvile, R. (2005). Personal exposure of street canyon intersection users to PM2. 5, ultrafine particle counts and carbon monoxide in Central London, UK. Atmospheric Environment, 39(20), 3629-3641. Go to original source...
    14. Kingham, S., Longley, I., Salmond, J., Pattinson, W., & Shrestha, K. (2013). Variations in exposure to traffic pollution while travelling by different modes in a low density, less congested city. Environmental Pollution, 181, 211-218. Go to original source...
    15. Knibbs, L. D., & de Dear, R. J. (2010). Exposure to ultrafine particles and PM2. 5 in four Sydney transport modes. Atmospheric Environment, 44(26), 3224-3227. Go to original source...
    16. KSTD, (2022). Karnataka State Transport Department Annual Report 2011-12. Commissioner for Transport and Road Safety, Bengaluru, pp. 34. Retrieved from https://transport.karnataka.gov.in/storage/pdf-files/annual%20report%202022-202-397.pdf
    17. Maji, K. J., Namdeo, A., Hoban, D., Bell, M., Goodman, P., Nagendra, S. M. S., Barnes, J., Vito, L. D., Hayes, E., Longhurst, J., Kumar, R., Sharma, N., Kuppili, S. K., & Alshetty, D. (2021). Analysis of various transport modes to evaluate personal exposure to PM2.5 pollution in Delhi. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 12(2), 417-431. Go to original source...
    18. McNabola, A., Broderick, B. M., & Gill, L. W. (2008). Relative exposure to fine particulate matter and VOCs between transport microenvironments in Dublin: Personal exposure and uptake. Atmospheric Environment, 42(26), 6496-6512. Go to original source...
    19. Memon, M. A., Ting, H., Cheah, J. H., Thurasamy, R., Chuah, F., & Cham, T. H. (2020). Sample size for survey research: Review and recommendations. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, 4(2), 1-20. Go to original source...
    20. Onat, B., & Stakeeva, B. (2013). Personal exposure of commuters in public transport to PM2.5 and fine particle counts. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 4, 329-335. Go to original source...
    21. Raj, M. G., & Karthikeyan, S. (2020). Effect of modes of transportation on commuters' exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) in Chennai, India. Environmental Engineering Research, 25(6), 898-907. Go to original source...
    22. Rajathi, A., Kumar, R.V. (2021). A Study on Customer Satisfaction on Government Buses with Special Reference From Trichy To Chennai. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Science, 9(12), 74-79.
    23. Shah, S., Rajiv, R. M., & Lokre, A. (2023). Moving toward gender-equitable transportation in post-COVID-19 urban South Asia. Transportation research record, 2677(4), 865-879. Go to original source...
    24. Sharma, N., Dhyani, R., & Gangopadhyay, S. (2013). Critical issues related to metro rail projects in India. Journal of Infrastructure Development, 5(1), 67-86. Go to original source...
    25. Shrestha, S., & Kazama, F. (2007). Assessment of surface water quality using multivariate statistical techniques: A case study of the Fuji river basin, Japan. Environmental Modelling & Software, 22(4), 464-475. Go to original source...
    26. Sinha, S., Swamy, H. S., & Modi, K. (2020). User perceptions of public transport service quality. Transportation Research Procedia, 48, 3310-3323. Go to original source...
    27. Sullivan, G. M., & Artino, A.R. Jr. (2013). Analyzing and interpreting data from likert-type scales. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 5(4), 541-2. Go to original source...
    28. Timmers, V. R. J. H., & Achten, P. A. J. (2016). Non-exhaust PM emissions from electric vehicles. Atmospheric environment, 134, 10-17. Go to original source...
    29. Vidal, N. P., Manful, C. F., Pham, T. H., Stewart, P., Keough, D., & Thomas, R. (2020). The use of XLSTAT in conducting principal component analysis (PCA) when evaluating the relationships between sensory and quality attributes in grilled foods. MethodsX, 7, 100835. Go to original source...
    30. Wright, C. (2009). A guide to Sampling and statistical reliability. Research Sandwell. Retrieved from https://www.sandwelltrends.info/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2018/07/A-guide-to-sampling-and-statistical-reliability.pdf
    31. Zuurbier, M., Hoek, G., Oldenwening, M., Lenters, V., Meliefste, K., Van Den Hazel, P., & Brunekreef, B. (2010). Commuters' exposure to particulate matter air pollution is affected by mode of transport, fuel type, and route. Environmental health perspectives, 118(6), 783-789. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content