Transactions on Transport Sciences 2024, 15(3):24-36 | DOI: 10.5507/tots.2024.009

Attitudes Towards E-scooter Safety - A Survey in Five Countries

Elisabeta Drimlováa, Matúš Šuchaa, Karel Rečkab, Narelle Haworthc, Aslak Fyhrid, Pontus Wallgrene, Peter Silveransf, Freya Slootmansf
a. Palacky University, Olomouc, Faculty of Arts, Psychology Department, Czech Republic
b. The Psychology Research Institute (INPSY), Faculty of Social Studies, Masaryk University, Czech Republic
c. Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Centre for Accident Research and Road Safety -Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia
d. Institute of Transport Economics, Oslo, Norway
e. Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
f. VIAS Institute, Brussels, Belgium

E-scooters are quite popular among young people in big cities. Their use seems to be a well-studied phenomenon. This study concentrates on the risky behaviour of e-scooter riders and on e-scooter riders' and non-riders' attitudes towards risky e-scooter riding. The goals were to describe these attitudes and to describe the most common types of risky e-scooter behaviours in five participating countries. An online questionnaire was developed and distributed in Australia, Belgium, the Czech Republic, Sweden, and Norway from June to September 2020. Respondents were recruited through sponsored Facebook ads and participant sharing (snowball sampling).

The riders in the countries considered in this study tend to perceive e-scooters as being quite safe. The majority of them even think e-scooters pose no danger to other road users. On the other hand, the non-riders believe riding an e-scooter is rather unsafe, with the exception of Belgium, where the respondents tend to think that it is very unsafe. When risky behaviour is considered, the non-riders tend to report more risky behaviour than e-scooter riders, even though fact-based observable behaviour, e.g. helmet use, should in principle be the same across both groups. In addition, as the existing literature shows, evidence suggests that young riders and male riders engage in more risky riding behaviours in comparison to older and female riders. This phenomenon should be addressed by effective preventive programmers and campaigns. The data shows that a greater frequency of riding predicted more risky riding behaviours. Although there are some differences between the samples under study, these findings can inspire police officers to promote e-scooter safety behaviour.

Keywords: Risky behaviour; Traffic safety; Micromobility; E-scooters; Traffic psychology.

Received: February 1, 2024; Revised: April 27, 2024; Accepted: May 28, 2024; Prepublished online: August 2, 2024; Published: December 1, 2024  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Drimlová, E., Šucha, M., Rečka, K., Haworth, N., Fyhri, A., Wallgren, P., Silverans, P., & Slootmans, F. (2024). Attitudes Towards E-scooter Safety - A Survey in Five Countries. Transactions on Transport Sciences, 15(3), 24-36. doi: 10.5507/tots.2024.009
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Aarhaug, J., Fearnley, N., Hartveit, KJL & Espen Johnsson, (2023). Price and competition in emerging shared e-scooter markets, Research in Transportation Economics 98, 101273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2023.101273 Go to original source...
    2. Aizpuru, M., Farley, K. X., Rojas, J. C., Crawford, R. S., Moore, T. J., & Wagner, E. R. (2019). Motorized injuries in the era of scooter-shares: A review of the national electronic surveillance system. American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 37(6), 1133-1138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2019.03.049 Go to original source...
    3. Allem, P., & Majmundar, A. (2019). Are electric scooters promoted on social media with safety in mind? A case study on Bird's Instagram. Preventive Medicine Reports 13, 62-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.11.013 Go to original source...
    4. Almannaa, M. H., Alsahhaf, F. A., Ashqar, H. I., Elhenawy, M., Masoud, M., & Rakotonirainy, A. (2021). Perception Analysis of E-Scooter Riders and Non-Riders in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: Survey Outputs. Sustainability, 13(2), 863. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020863 Go to original source...
    5. Arellano, J., F., & Fang, K. (2019). Sunday Drivers, or Too Fast and Too Furious? Transport Findings. DOI: 10.32866/001c.11210 Go to original source...
    6. Badeau, A., Carman, C., Newman, M., Steenblik, J., Carlson, M., & Madsen, T. (2019). Emergency department visits for electric scooter-related injuries after introduction of an urban rental program.The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 37(8), 1531-1533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2019.05.003 Go to original source...
    7. Bekhit, M.N.Z., Le Fevre, J. & Bergin, C.J., (2020). Regional healthcare costs and burden of injury associated with electric scooters. Injury 51, 271-277. Go to original source...
    8. Brisbane City Council (2023). E-mobility parking hubs. Retrieved 24th April 2024 from https://www.brisbane.qld.gov.au/traffic-and-transport/transport-plan-for-brisbane/transport-plan-for-brisbane-implementation-plan/brisbanes-e-mobility-strategy/e-mobility-parking-hubs
    9. Buehler, R., Broaddus, A., Sweeney, T., Zhang, W., White, E., & Mollenhauer, M. (2021). Changes in Travel Behavior, Attitudes, and Preferences among E-Scooter Riders and Nonriders: First Look at Results from Pre and Post E-Scooter System Launch Surveys at Virginia Tech. Transportation Research Record, 2675(9), 335-345. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981211002213 Go to original source...
    10. Burt N & Ahmed Z. (2023). E-scooter attitudes and risk-taking behaviours: an international systematic literature review and survey responses in the West Midlands, United Kingdom. Front Public Health, 11, 1277378. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1277378. Go to original source...
    11. Che, M., Lum, K. M., & Wong, Y. D. (2021). Users' attitudes on electric scooter riding speed on shared footpath: A virtual reality study. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 15(2), 152-161. DOI: 10.1080/15568318.2020.1718252 Go to original source...
    12. Chini, M. (2023). Brussels opts for Dott and Bolt: Only 8,000 more e-scooters from February 2024. Brussels Tiems. Retrieved 24th April 2024 from: https://www.brusselstimes.com/850824/brussels-opts-for-dott-and-bolt-only-8000-more-e-scooters-from-february-tbtb
    13. Dhillon, N. K., Juillard, C., Barmparas, G., Lin, T., Kim, D. Y., Turay, D., Seibold, A. R., Kaminski, S., Duncan, T. K., Diaz, G., Saad, S, Hanpeter, D., Benjamin, E. R., Tillou, A., Demetriades, D., Inaba, K., & Ley, E. J. (2020). Electric Scooter Injury in Southern California Trauma Centers. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 231(1), 133-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.02.047. Go to original source...
    14. Dopravní noviny (2022). Jak Češi využívali Bolt v roce 2022. https://www.dnoviny.cz/expresni-sluzby/jak-cesi-vyuzivali-bolt-v-roce-2022
    15. Fearnley, N., Karlsen, K. & Bjørnskau, T., (2021). E-scooters in Norway: Main results from two web-surveys autumn 2021. The Institute of Transport Economics Norwegian Centre for Transport Research https://www.toi.no/getfile.php/1372931-1651745172/Publikasjoner/T%C3%98I%20rapporter/2022/1889-2022/1889-2022_Summary.pdf
    16. Fitt, H., & Curl, A. (2019). E-scooter use in New Zealand: Insights around some frequently asked questions. https://ir.canterbury.ac.nz/handle/10092/16336
    17. Gioldasis, C. H., Christoforou, Z., & Seidowsky, R. (2021). Risk-taking behaviors of e-scooter users: A survey in Paris. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 163, 106427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.106427. Go to original source...
    18. Glavić, D., Trpković, A., Milenković, M., & Jevremović, S. (2021). The E-Scooter Potential to Change Urban Mobility-Belgrade Case Study. Sustainability, 13(11), 5948. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13115948 Go to original source...
    19. Gössling, S. (2020). Integrating e-scooters in urban transportation: Problems, policies, and the prospect of system change. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 79, 102230. Go to original source...
    20. Gibson, H., Curl, A., & Thompson, L. (2021). Blurred boundries: E-scooter riders´ and pedestrians´ experiences of sharing space. Mobilities, 17(1), 69-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2021.1967097 Go to original source...
    21. Hardt, C., & Bogenberger, K. (2019). Usage of e-Scooters in Urban Environments. Transportation Research Procedia, 37, 155-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2018.12.178. Go to original source...
    22. Haworth, N., Schramm, A., & Twisk, D. (2021). Comparing the risky behaviours of shared and private e-scooter and bicycle riders in downtown Brisbane, Australia. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 152, 105981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.105981 Go to original source...
    23. Haworth, N., Ssi Yan Kai, N., & Schramm, A. (2024). Understanding nonuse of mandatory e-scooter helmets. Traffic Injury Prevention, 25(5), 757-764. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2024.2335677 Go to original source...
    24. Hollingsworth, J., Copeland, B., & Johnson, J.X. (2019). Are e-scooters polluters? The environmental impacts of shared dockless electric scooters. Environmental Research Letters, 14, 84031. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab2da8. Go to original source...
    25. IAA Mobility (2024). E-scooters: using rules to combat a bad reputation. Retrieved 11th April 2024 from https://www.iaa-mobility.com/en/newsroom/news/cycling-micromobility/ e-scooters-using-rules-to-combat-a-bad-reputation
    26. James, O., Swiderski, J., Hicks, J., Teoman, D., & Buehler, R. (2019). Pedestrians and E-Scooters: An Initial Look at E-Scooter Parking and Perceptions by Riders and Non-Riders. Sustainability, 11(20), 5591. doi:10.3390/su11205591 Retrieved 27th September 2021 Go to original source...
    27. Javadinasr, M., Asgharpour, S., Rahimi, E., Choobchian, P., Mohammadian, A. K., & Auld, J. (2022). Eliciting attitudinal factors affecting the continuance use of E-scooters: An empirical study in Chicago. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 87, 87-101, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2022.03.019. Go to original source...
    28. Kopplin, C. S., Brand, B. M., & Reichenberger, Y. (2021). Consumer acceptance of shared e-scooters for urban and short-distance mobility. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 91, 102680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102680. Go to original source...
    29. Laa, B., & Leth, U. (2020). Survey of E-scooter users in Vienna: Who they are and how they ride. Journal of Transport Geography, 89, 102874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102874 Go to original source...
    30. Lawler, R. (2012). Zipcar for Scooters. Startup Scoot Networks Launches to the Public in San Francisco. Available online: http://tcrn.ch/SlDjD3
    31. Lee, H., Baek, K., Chung, J., & Kim, J. (2021). Factors affecting heterogeneity in willingness to use e-scooter sharing services. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 92, 102751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102751. Go to original source...
    32. Ma, Ch., Yang, D., Zhou, J., Feng, Z. & Yuan, Q. (2019). Risk Riding Behaviors of Urban E-Bikes: A Literature Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 16(13), 2308. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16132308. Go to original source...
    33. Maiti, A., Vinayaga-Sureshkanth, N., Jadiwala, M., Wijewickrama, R., & Griffin, G. P. (2020). Impact of E-scooter on Pedestrian Safety: A Field Study Using Pedestrian Crowd-Sensing. 2022 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops and other Affiliated Events (PerCom Workshops), 799-805. Go to original source...
    34. Mathew, J., Liu, M., Seeder, S., Li, H., & Bullock, D. M. (2019). Analysis of E-scooter trips and their temporal usage patterns. Institute of Transportation Engineers. ITE Journal, 89(6), 44-49. https://search.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/analysis-e-scooter-trips-their-temporal-usage/docview/2251991862/se-2?accountid=16730
    35. McKenzie, G. (2019). Spatiotemporal comparative analysis of scooter-share and bike-share usage patterns in Washington, D.C. Journal of Transport Geography, 78,19-28, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.05.007. Go to original source...
    36. McQueen, M.G., (2020). Comparing the promise and reality of e-scooters: A critical assessment of equity improvements and mode shift. Dissertations and Theses. Paper 5565. Portland State University. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds/5565/
    37. Mitra, R., & Hess, P. M. (2021).Who are the potential users of shared e-scooters? An examination of socio-demographic, attitudinal and environmental factors. Travel Behaviour and Society 23, 100-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2020.12.004 Go to original source...
    38. Moreau, H., de Jamblinne de Meux, L., Zeller, V., D'Ans, P., Ruwet, C., & Achten, W.M.J. (2020). Dockless E-scooter: A green solution for mobility? Comparative case study between dockless E-scooters, displaced transport, and personal E-scooters. Sustainability 12, 1803. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051803. Go to original source...
    39. NACTO - National Association of City Transportation Officials (2018). Shared Micromobility in the US: 2018. https://nacto.org/shared-micromobility-2018/.
    40. Nikiforiadis, A., Paschalidis, E., Stamatiadis, N., Raptopoulou, A., Kostareli, A., & Basbas, S. (2021). Analysis of attitudes and engagement of shared e-scooter users. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 94, 102790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102790. Go to original source...
    41. Nikiforiadis, A., Paschalidis, E., Stamatiadis, N., Paloka, N., Tsekoura, E., & Basbas, S. (2023). E-scooters and other mode trip chaining: Preferences and attitudes of university students. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 170, 103636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2023.103636. Go to original source...
    42. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Attitudes and persuasion - classic and contemporary approaches. Dubuque. Brown.
    43. Pinheiro, Y. (2023). Europe's shared e-scooter fleet more than doubled in 2022. Zagdaily. Retrieved 24th April 2024 from https://zagdaily.com/trends/europes-shared-e-scooter-fleet-more-than-doubled-in-2022/
    44. Radics, M., Shibayama, T., & Emberger, G. (2020). Shared Electric Scooters in Vienna: Analyzing Usage Characteristics with Limited Data. https://doi.org/10.34726/1032 Go to original source...
    45. Rashed, S., Vassiliou, A., & Barber, J. (2022). Neurosurgical trauma from E-Scooter usage: a review of early case series in London and a review of the literature. British Journal of Neurosurgery, 36(4), 532-543. https://doi.org/10.1080/02688697.2021.2024506 Go to original source...
    46. Reinhardt, K., & Deakin, E. (2020). Best Practices for the Public Management of Electric Scooters. UC Office of the President: University of California Institute of Transportation Studies. http://dx.doi.org/10.7922/G289144Q https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8x67x360 Go to original source...
    47. Sanders, R. L., Branion-Calles, M., & Nelson, T. A. (2020). To scoot or not to scoot: Findings from a recent survey about the benefits and barriers of using E-scooters for riders and non-riders. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 139, 217-227, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.07.009. Go to original source...
    48. Schellong, D., Sadek, P., Schaetzberger, C., & Barrack, T. (2019). The promise and pitfalls of e-scooter sharing. Boston Consulting Group. https://www.bcg.com/publications/2019/promise-pitfalls-e-scooter-sharing
    49. Schlaff, C. D., Sack, K. D., Elliott, R., & Rosner, M. K.(2019). Early Experience with Electric Scooter Injuries Requiring Neurosurgical Evaluation in District of Columbia: A Case Series.WorldNeurosurgery, 132, 202-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.08.237 Go to original source...
    50. Siebert, F.W., Hoffknecht, M., Englert, F., Edwards, T., Useche, S.A., & Rötting, M. (2021). Safety Related Behaviors and Law Adherence of Shared E-Scooter Riders in Germany. In: Krömker, H. (ed.) HCI in Mobility, Transport, and Automotive Systems. HCII 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 12791. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78358-7_31 Go to original source...
    51. Sikka, N., Vila, C., Stratton, M., Ghassemi, M., & Pourmand, A. (2019). Sharing the sidewalk: A case of E-scooter-related pedestrian injury. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 37, 9, 1807.e5-1807.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2019.06.017 Go to original source...
    52. Smith, C.S., & Schwieterman, J. P. (2018). E-Scooter Scenarios:Evaluating the Potential Mobility Benefits of Shared Dockless Scooters in Chicago. TRID. https://las.depaul.edu/centers-and-institutes/chaddick-institute-for-metropolitan-development/research-and-publications/Documents/E-ScooterScenariosMicroMobilityStudy_FINAL_20181212.pdf
    53. Šucha, M., Drimlová, E., Rečka, K., Haworth, N., Karlsen, K., Fyhri, A., ... & Slootmans, F. (2023). E-scooter riders and pedestrians: Attitudes and interactions in five countries. Heliyon, 9(4). Go to original source...
    54. Todd, J., Krauss, D., Zimmermann, J., & Dunning, A. (2019). Behavior of Electric Scooter Operators in Naturalistic Environments. SAE Technical Paper 2019-01-1007, 2019, doi:10.4271/2019-01-1007. Go to original source...
    55. Trivedi, T.K., Liu, C., Antonio, A.L.M., Wheaton, N., Kreger, V., Yap, A., Schriger, D., Elmore, J.G., (2019). Injuries Associated With Standing Electric Scooter Use. Journal of the American Medical Association Network Open 2(1), e187381. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.7381. Go to original source...
    56. Tuncer, S., Laurier, E., Brown, B., & Licoppe, C. (2020). Notes on the practices and appearances of e-scooter users in public space. Journal of Transport Geography, 85, 2020, 102702, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102702. Go to original source...
    57. Useche, S. A., O'Hern, S., Gonzalez-Marin, A., Gene-Morales, J., Alonso, F., & Stephens, A. N. (2022). Unsafety on two wheels, or social prejudice? Proxying behavioral reports on bicycle and e-scooter riding safety - A mixed-methods study. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 89; 2022; 168-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2022.06.015. Go to original source...
    58. Zhang M, Jipp M, & Ihme K. (2022). The Novelty Appraisal of the Feeling of Risk in Vehicles. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(21), 14259. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192114259 Go to original source...
    59. Zou, Z., Younes, H., Erdogan, S., & Wu, J. (2020). Exploratory Analysis of Real-Time E-Scooter Trip Data in Washington, D.C. Transportation Research Record, 2674(8), 285-299. DOI: 10.1177/0361198120919760 Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content