Transactions on Transport Sciences 2023, 14(3):61-68 | DOI: 10.5507/tots.2023.009
Exploring the Correlation Between Preexisting Knowledge and Public Perception of Self-Driving Cars
- a. Civil engineering department, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada, Canada
- b. Public works department, Faculty of engineering, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
Self-driving vehicles (SDVs) possess the potential to provide novel benefits while also presenting new risks. Consequently, SDVs are expected to not only influence the transportation network but also reshape urban landscapes, markets, economies, and public behavior. The public's willingness to utilize or ride in SDVs is a critical factor determining the extent to which their implications can be realized. Previous research has indicated that awareness of SDVs is a key factor influencing the public's decision-making and attitude toward this nascent technology. However, none of these studies have exclusively examined the relationship between the public's level of knowledge about SDVs and their attitudes. Thus, this study employs a questionnaire survey to investigate the relationship between the public's attitudes and their knowledge of SDVs. The study analyzes 2447 complete responses collected from participants in the United States. The findings suggest that individuals possessing prior knowledge of SDVs are more likely to use them. However, participants with intermediate knowledge were the most likely to use SDVs compared to those with no knowledge and those with extensive knowledge. Moreover, the analysis demonstrates that the relationship between the level of knowledge and acceptance of SDVs is non-linear and peaks at the intermediate knowledge level.
Keywords: Interest, Trust, Concern, Self-driving cars; Knowledge, Public attitude
Received: February 6, 2023; Revised: April 1, 2023; Accepted: April 12, 2023; Prepublished online: June 7, 2023; Published: December 13, 2023 Show citation
References
- Othman, K., (2022b). Exploring the implications of autonomous vehicles: A comprehensive review. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 7(2), p. 165.
Go to original source...
- Othman, K. (2022c). Multidimension analysis of autonomous vehicles: the future of mobility. Civil Engineering Journal, 7, 71-93.
Go to original source...
- Abdelgawad, H. & Othman, K. (2020). Multifaceted synthesis of autonomous vehicles' emerging landscape. In Connected and autonomous vehicles in smart cities. CRC Press. 67-113.
Go to original source...
- Kopelias, P., Demiridi, E., Vogiatzis, K., Skabardonis, A. & Zafiropoulou, V. (2020). Connected & autonomous vehicles-Environmental impacts-A review. Science of the total environment, 712, p. 135237.
Go to original source...
- Spence, J.C., Kim, Y.B., Lamboglia, C.G., Lindeman, C., Mangan, A.J., McCurdy, A.P., Stearns, J.A., Wohlers, B., Sivak, A. & Clark, M.I. (2020). Potential impact of autonomous vehicles on movement behavior: a scoping review. American journal of preventive medicine, 58(6), e191-e199.
Go to original source...
- Narayanan, S., Chaniotakis, E. & Antoniou, C. (2020). Shared autonomous vehicle services: A comprehensive review. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 111, 255-293.
Go to original source...
- Othman, K., (2022a). Cities in the Era of Autonomous Vehicles: A Comparison Between Conventional Vehicles and Autonomous Vehicles. In Resilient and Responsible Smart Cities. Cham: Springer International Publishing. 95-108.
Go to original source...
- Othman, K., (2021b). Public acceptance and perception of autonomous vehicles: a comprehensive review. AI and Ethics, 1(3), 355-387.
Go to original source...
- Othman, K. (2023). Public attitude towards autonomous vehicles before and after crashes: A detailed analysis based on the demographic characteristics. Cogent Engineering, 10(1), p. 2156063.
Go to original source...
- Othman, K., (2021a). Impact of autonomous vehicles on the physical infrastructure: Changes and challenges. Designs, 5(3), p. 40.
Go to original source...
- Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.
- Berliner, R.M., Hardman, S. & Tal, G. (2019). Uncovering early adopter's perceptions and purchase intentions of automated vehicles: Insights from early adopters of electric vehicles in California. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 60, 712-722.
Go to original source...
- Agarwal, R. & Prasad, J. (1997). The role of innovation characteristics and perceived voluntariness in the acceptance of information technologies. Decision sciences, 28(3), 557-582.
Go to original source...
- Brockman, B.K. & Morgan, R.M. (1999). The evolution of managerial innovations in distribution: what prospects for ECR? International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 27(10), 397-408.
Go to original source...
- Freeman, C. (1995). The 'National System of Innovation'in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of economics, 19(1), 5-24.
- Hardman, S., Steinberger-Wilckens, R. & Van Der Horst, D. (2013). Disruptive innovations: the case for hydrogen fuel cells and battery electric vehicles. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 38(35), 15438-15451.
Go to original source...
- Hsu, C.L., Lu, H.P. & Hsu, H.H. (2007). Adoption of the mobile Internet: An empirical study of multimedia message service (MMS). Omega, 35(6), 715-726.
Go to original source...
- Johnson, V.L., Kiser, A., Washington, R. & Torres, R. (2018). Limitations to the rapid adoption of M-payment services: Understanding the impact of privacy risk on M-Payment services. Computers in Human Behavior, 79, 111-122.
Go to original source...
- Van Slyke, C., Ilie, V., Lou, H. & Stafford, T. (2007). Perceived critical mass and the adoption of a communication technology. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(3), 270-283.
Go to original source...
- Davis, N. (2018). New laser technology lets driverless cars see round corners. Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/mar/05/selfdriving-cars-may-soon-be-able-to-see-around-corners.
- Halsey, A. (2017). Driverless cars promise far greater mobility for the elderly and people with disabilities. Wash. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/trafficandcommuting/driverless-cars-promise-far-greater-mobility-for-theelderly-and-people-with-disabilities/2017/11/23/6994469c-c4a3-11e7-84bc-5e285c7f4512_story.html?utm_term=.b5549509a7a4
- Wakabayashi, D. (2018). Self-driving Uber car kills Arizona pedestrian, where robots roam. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/19/technology/uber-driverless-fatality.html
- Geer, J.G. & Kahn, K.F., 1993. Grabbing attention: An experimental investigation of headlines during campaigns. Political Communication, 10(2), 175-191.
Go to original source...
- Gerber, A.S., Karlan, D. & Bergan, D. (2009). Does the media matter? A field experiment measuring the effect of newspapers on voting behavior and political opinions. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 1(2), 35-52.
Go to original source...
- Kull, S., Ramsay, C. & Lewis, E. (2003). Misperceptions, the media, and the Iraq war. Political science quarterly, 118(4), 569-598.
Go to original source...
- Siegrist, M. & Cvetkovich, G. (2000). Perception of hazards: The role of social trust and knowledge. Risk analysis, 20(5), 713-720.
Go to original source...
- Siegrist, M. (2000). The influence of trust and perceptions of risks and benefits on the acceptance of gene technology. Risk analysis, 20(2), 195-204.
Go to original source...
- Ward, C., Raue, M., Lee, C., D'Ambrosio, L. & Coughlin, J.F. (2017). Acceptance of automated driving across generations: The role of risk and benefit perception, knowledge, and
- trust. In Human-Computer Interaction. User Interface Design, Development and Multimodality: 19th International Conference, HCI International 2017, Vancouver, BC, Canada, July 9-14, 2017, Proceedings, Part I 19. Springer International Publishing, 254-266.
- Poczter, S.L. & Jankovic, L.M. (2014). The google car: driving toward a better future? Journal of Business Case Studies (JBCS), 10(1), 7-14.
Go to original source...
- Stewart, L., Musa, M., Croce, N. (2019). Look no hands: self-driving vehicles' public trust problem. World economic Forum. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/08/self-driving-vehicles-public-trust/
- American Automobile Association (AAA) (2018). Fact Sheet Vehicle Technology Survey-Phase IIIB. Retrieved from https://publicaffairsresources.aaa.biz/download/10980/
- Lienert, P. (2018). Most Americans wary of self-driving cars: Reuters/Ipsos poll. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-autos-selfdriving-usa-poll/most-americans-wary-of-selfdriving-cars-reuters-ipsos-poll-idUSKBN1FI034
- Nordhoff, S., Kyriakidis, M., Van Arem, B. & Happee, R. (2019). A multi-level model on automated vehicle acceptance (MAVA): A review-based study. Theoretical issues in ergonomics science, 20(6), 682-710.
Go to original source...
- Janatabadi, F. & Ermagun, A. (2022). Empirical evidence of bias in public acceptance of autonomous vehicles. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 84, 330-347.
Go to original source...
- Liu, P., Guo, Q., Ren, F., Wang, L. & Xu, Z. (2019). Willingness to pay for self-driving vehicles: Influences of demographic and psychological factors. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 100, 306-317.
Go to original source...
- Ho, S.S., Leow, V.J.X. & Leung, Y.W. (2020). Driving without the brain? Effects of value predispositions, media attention, and science knowledge on public willingness to use driverless cars in Singapore. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 71, 49-61.
Go to original source...
- Nordhoff, S., Louw, T., Innamaa, S., Lehtonen, E., Beuster, A., Torrao, G., Bjorvatn, A., Kessel, T., Malin, F., Happee, R. & Merat, N. (2020). Using the UTAUT2 model to explain public acceptance of conditionally automated (L3) cars: A questionnaire study among 9,118 car drivers from eight European countries. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 74, 0280-297.
Go to original source...
- Golbabaei, F., Yigitcanlar, T., Paz, A. & Bunker, J. (2020). Individual predictors of autonomous vehicle public acceptance and intention to use: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(4), p.106.
Go to original source...
- König, M. & Neumayr, L. (2017). Users' resistance towards radical innovations: The case of the self-driving car. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 44, 42-52.
Go to original source...
- Charness, N., Yoon, J.S., Souders, D., Stothart, C. and Yehnert, C. (2018). Predictors of attitudes toward autonomous vehicles: The roles of age, gender, prior knowledge, and personality. Frontiers in psychology, 9, p. 2589.
Go to original source...
- Jing, P., Huang, H., Ran, B., Zhan, F. & Shi, Y. (2019). Exploring the factors affecting mode choice Intention of autonomous vehicle based on an extended theory of planned behavior-A case study in China. Sustainability, 11(4), p. 01155.
Go to original source...
- Stilgoe, J. & Cohen, T. (2021). Rejecting acceptance: learning from public dialogue on self-driving vehicles. Science and Public Policy, 48(6), 849-859.
Go to original source...
- United States Census Bureau (2022). Growth in U.S. Population Shows Early Indication of Recovery Amid COVID-19 Pandemic. Retrieved from: https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2022/2022-population-estimates.html
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.