Transactions on Transport Sciences 2023, 14(3):25-31 | DOI: 10.5507/tots.2023.016

Examination of the Effects of the Pandemic Process on the E-scooter Usage Behaviours of Individuals with Machine Learning

Emre Kuskapana, Tiziana Campisib*, Giulia De Cetc, Chiara Vianelloc, d, Muhammed Yasin Codure
a. Engineering and Architecture Faculty, Erzurum Technical University, 25050 Erzurum, Turkey
b. Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, University of Enna Kore, Cittadella Universitaria 94100 Enna, Italy
c. Department of Industrial Engineering - University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy
d. Department of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering - University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy
e. College of Engineering and Technology, American University of the Middle East, Egaila 54200, Kuwait

Analysing user behaviour and thus travel mode choice is an important task in transport planning and policy-making in order to understand and predict travel demand. Recent pandemic events have challenged the modal choices of European users by reducing the use of public transport at various times and favouring walking and/or the use of electric bikes and scooters for last-mile travel. A number of studies have focused on analysing how the pandemic affected workers' choice of transport mode, with particular reference to local public transport, by developing multinomial logistic regression and artificial neural network models to analyse travellers' choice of transport mode before and after COVID-19. Particularly in non-European contexts, studies have been conducted on the relationship between socio-economic factors and the duration of e-scooter trips before and during the health crisis caused by the pandemic. in these contexts, a general increase in the duration of e-scooter trips after the pandemic was shown. Few studies, however, have analysed the European context.

Several factors relating to services and infrastructure as well as socio-demographic components contributed to the propensity to use e-scooters as evidenced by a number of literature works in the European context. However, little research has been conducted using the machine learning approach to understand which factors and how they may influence modal choices. The present research work focused on the analysis of last-mile transport choices by investigating the propensity of a sample of users residing in Sicily during different time phases before and after the COVID-19 pandemic. In this study, 35 different classes were determined for a total of 545 data. The classification process was carried out using SMO, KNN and RF machine learning algorithms.

The results showed a reduction in the frequency of e-scooter use during the health crisis caused by the pandemic. The results showed that this was a temporary behaviour, even though the purpose of e-scooter use by most individuals changed during the health crisis caused by the pandemic. However, it was observed that the frequency of e-scooter use decreased in most individuals during the health crisis caused by the pandemic and this became a permanent behaviour.

The results suggest that the analysis of the importance of variables in relation to different periods and is essential for a better understanding and effective modelling of people's travel behaviour and for improving the attractiveness of these means of transport for companies operating services in the areas examined.

Keywords: E-scooter; Machine learning; Pre-post COVID-19 travel behaviour; Mobility choices; Sicily

Received: May 20, 2023; Revised: August 21, 2023; Accepted: September 13, 2023; Prepublished online: October 4, 2023; Published: December 13, 2023  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kuskapan, E., Campisi, T., De Cet, G., Vianello, C., & Codur, M.Y. (2023). Examination of the Effects of the Pandemic Process on the E-scooter Usage Behaviours of Individuals with Machine Learning. Transactions on Transport Sciences, 14(3), 25-31. doi: 10.5507/tots.2023.016
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Akgün-Tanbay, N., Campisi, T., Tanbay, T., Tesoriere, G., & Dissanayake, D. (2022). Modelling road user perceptions towards safety, comfort, and chaos at shared space: the via maqueda case study, Italy. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2022, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4979496 Go to original source...
    2. Ali, T. (2021). Analysis of traveler's behaviorusing electric scooters based on surveys. Retrieved from http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-301170
    3. Bell, J. (2022). What is machine learning?. Machine Learning and the City: Applications in Architecture and Urban Design, 207-216. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119815075.CH18 Go to original source...
    4. Biau, G., & Scornet, E. (2016). A random forest guided tour. Test, 25, 197-227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11749-016-0481-7 Go to original source...
    5. Bradley, A. P. (1997). The use of the area under the ROC curve in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms. Pattern Recognition, 30(7), 1145-1159. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-3203(96)00142-2 Go to original source...
    6. Caballini, C., Agostino, M., & Dalla Chiara, B. (2021). Physical mobility and virtual communication in Italy: Trends, analytical relationships and policies for the post COVID-19. Transport Policy, 110, 314-334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.06.007 Go to original source...
    7. Campisi, T., Akgün-Tanbay, N., Md Nahiduzzaman, K., & Dissanayake, D. (2021). Uptake of e-Scooters in Palermo, Italy: Do the Road Users Tend to Rent, Buy or Share? Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 12953. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86976-2_46 Go to original source...
    8. Campisi, T., Nikitas, A., Al-Rashid, M. A., Nikiforiadis, A., Tesoriere, G., & Basbas, S. (2022a). The Rise of E-scooters in Palermo: A SWOT Analysis and Travel Time Study. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 13380, 469-483. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10542-5_32 Go to original source...
    9. Campisi, T., Tesoriere, G., Trouva, M., Papas, T., & Basbas, S. (2022b). Impact of Teleworking on Travel Behaviour During the COVID-19 Era: The Case Of Sicily, Italy. Transportation Research Procedia, 60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2021.12.033 Go to original source...
    10. Carbonell, J. G., Michalski, R. S., & Mitchell, T. M. (1983). An Overview of Machine Learning. Machine Learning, 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-12405-5_1 Go to original source...
    11. Carrese, S., Giacchetti, T., Nigro, M., Algeri, G., & Ceccarelli, G. (2021). Analysis and management of E-scooter sharing service in Italy. 2021 7th International Conference on Models and Technologies for Intelligent Transportation Systems, MT-ITS. https://doi.org/10.1109/MT-ITS49943.2021.9529274 Go to original source...
    12. Caselli, M., Fracasso, A., & Scicchitano, S. (2022). From the lockdown to the new normal: individual mobility and local labor market characteristics following the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy. Journal of Population Economics, 35(4), 1517-1550. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3710568 Go to original source...
    13. della Mura, M., Failla, S., Gori, N., Micucci, A., & Paganelli, F. (2022). E-Scooter Presence in Urban Areas: Are Consistent Rules, Paying Attention and Smooth Infrastructure Enough for Safety? Sustainability, 14(21), 14303. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114303 Go to original source...
    14. Dias, G., Arsenio, E., & Ribeiro, P. (2021). The Role of Shared E-Scooter Systems in Urban Sustainability and Resilience during the Covid-19 Mobility Restrictions. Sustainability, 13(13), 7084. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU13137084 Go to original source...
    15. Faiyetole, A. A. (2022). COVID-19 stimulated travel behavior policy framework with evidence from travel change in southwestern Nigeria. Trans Transp Sci, 13(3), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.5507/tots.2022.018 Go to original source...
    16. Glaviæ, D., Trpkoviæ, A., Milenkoviæ, M., & Jevremoviæ, S. (2021). The E-Scooter Potential to Change Urban Mobility-Belgrade Case Study. Sustainability, 13(11), 5948. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU13115948 Go to original source...
    17. Hossein Sabbaghian, M., Llopis-Castelló, D., & García, A. (2023). A Safe Infrastructure for Micromobility: The Current State of Knowledge. Sustainability, 15(13), 10140. https://www.istat.it/it/files//2022/07/incidenti2022.pdf Go to original source...
    18. İnaç., H. (2023). Micro-Mobility Sharing System Accident Case Analysis by Statistical Machine Learning Algorithms. Sustainability, 15(3), 2097. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU15032097 Go to original source...
    19. Ingoglia, M. (2022). Mobility as a Service: state of the art overview, criticalities, Italian proposals and analysis of people's opinions and behaviour. Retrieved from https://webthesis.biblio.polito.it/secure/25518/1/tesi.pdf
    20. ISTAT (2021) https://www.istat.it/it/archivio/273324
    21. ISTAT (2022) https://www.istat.it/it/files/2023/07/REPORT_INCIDENTI_STRADALI_2022_IT.pdf
    22. König, A., Gebhardt, L., Stark, K., & Schuppan, J. (2022). A Multi-Perspective Assessment of the Introduction of E-Scooter Sharing in Germany. Sustainability, 14(5), 2639. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU14052639 Go to original source...
    23. Kramer, O. (2013). K-Nearest Neighbors. In: Dimensionality Reduction with Unsupervised Nearest Neighbors. Intelligent Systems Reference Library, 51, 13-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38652-7_2 Go to original source...
    24. Kubik, A. (2022). CO2 Emissions of Electric Scooters Used in Shared Mobility Systems. Energies, 15(21), 8188. https://doi.org/10.3390/EN15218188 Go to original source...
    25. Kuºkapan, E., Çodur, M. Y., & Atalay, A. (2021). Speed violation analysis of heavy vehicles on highways using spatial analysis and machine learning algorithms. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 155, 106098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.106098 Go to original source...
    26. Kuºkapan, E., Sahraei, M. A., Çodur, M. K., & Çodur, M. Y. (2022). Pedestrian safety at signalized intersections: Spatial and machine learning approaches. Journal of Transport & Health, 24, 101322. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JTH.2021.101322 Go to original source...
    27. Laaksonen, J., & Oja, E. (1996). Classification with learning k-nearest neighbors. IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks - Conference Proceedings, 3, 1480-1483. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNN.1996.549118 Go to original source...
    28. Li, A., Zhao, P., Liu, X., Mansourian, A., Axhausen, K. W., & Qu, X. (2022). Comprehensive comparison of e-scooter sharing mobility: Evidence from 30 European cities. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 105, 103229. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRD.2022.103229 Go to original source...
    29. Moslem, S., Campisi, T., Szmelter-Jarosz, A., Duleba, S., Nahiduzzaman, K. M., & Tesoriere, G. (2020). Best-worst method for modelling mobility choice after COVID-19: Evidence from Italy. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176824 Go to original source...
    30. Pazzini, M., Cameli, L., Lantieri, C., Vignali, V., Dondi, G., & Jonsson, T. (2022). New Micromobility Means of Transport: An Analysis of E-Scooter Users' Behaviour in Trondheim. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(12), 7374. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJERPH19127374 Go to original source...
    31. Platt, J. C. (1998). Sequential Minimal Optimization: A Fast Algorithm for Training Support Vector Machines. Retrieved from https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/sequential-minimal-optimization-a-fast-algorithm-for-training-support-vector-machines/
    32. Ravalet, E., & Rérat, P. (2019). Teleworking: Decreasing Mobility or Increasing Tolerance of Commuting Distances? Built Environment, 45(4), 582-602. https://doi.org/10.2148/BENV.45.4.582 Go to original source...
    33. Rigatti, S. J. (2017). Random Forest. Journal of Insurance Medicine, 47(1), 31-39. https://doi.org/10.17849/INSM-47-01-31-39.1 Go to original source...
    34. Tikoudis, I., Martinez, L., Farrow, K., Bouyssou, C. G., Petrik, O., & Oueslati, W. (2021). Exploring the impact of shared mobility services on CO2. OECD Environment Working Papers. https://doi.org/10.1787/9D20DA6C-EN Go to original source...
    35. Useche, S. A., Gonzalez-Marin, A., Faus, M., & Alonso, F. (2022). Environmentally friendly, but behaviorally complex? A systematic review of e-scooter riders' psychosocial risk features. PLoS one, 17(5), https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268960 Go to original source...
    36. Vitetta, A. (2022). Sustainable Mobility as a Service: Framework and Transport System Models. Information, Vol. 13(7), 346. https://doi.org/10.3390/INFO13070346 Go to original source...
    37. Weschke, J., Oostendorp, R., & Hardinghaus, M. (2022). Mode shift, motivational reasons, and impact on emissions of shared e-scooter usage. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 112, 103468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103468 Go to original source...
    38. Zhao, P., Li, A., Pilesjö, P., & Mansourian, A. (2022). A machine learning based approach for predicting usage efficiency of shared e-scooters using vehicle availability data. AGILE: GIScience Series, 3, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.5194/AGILE-GISS-3-20-2022 Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content