Transactions on Transport Sciences 2023, 14(1):24-29 | DOI: 10.5507/tots.2022.021

Modal shift behavior of car users to light rail transit, some evidence from the field

Mohammadhossein Abbasia, Amir Reza Mamdoohia*, Wulf-Holger Arndtb
a. Faculty of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Transportation Planning Department, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran 14117, Iran.
b. Centre for Technology and Society, Research Unit "mobility and Space", Technische Universität Berlin, 10553 Berlin, Germany.

Growing population and car dependency in developing countries have led to congestion that adversely affects the environment, travel time, trip cost, accidents, and public transportation reliability. Through implementation of travel demand management (TDM) policies, governments and policymakers aim to reduce private vehicle dependency and encourage people to use public transportation. Light rail transit is an important part of an attractive public transport. Rail transportation systems, though offer many potential benefits, are a major financial challenge for governments because of the high capital and operation costs. Therefore, passenger behavior must be determined before a new system is introduced. Using a stated preference (SP) questionnaire, private car users' behavior in Tehran's universities has been investigated to determine the explanatory factors affecting the modal shift to urban light rail transit (LRT). A binary logit model estimation results showed that men are less likely than women to shift toward LRT because they rely more on their private cars. It was the provision of free on-street parking at destinations and the frequency of using private cars on a weekly basis that had the most negative effect on LRT modal shift, demonstrating the critical role that implementation of TDM policies could play. Moreover, reduction in travel time by LRT has the most positive impact on modal shift toward LRT among private car users. As an interesting finding, marginal effect values indicate that a 10% reduction in travel time (0.32) has a greater impact than the possibility of sitting 50% of the travel time (0.25) on the likelihood of modal shift to LRT. Furthermore, the probability of modal shift to LRT will be reduced by 0.12 units for each unit increase in car ownership. In addition, owning a driver's license was also negatively correlated with LRT modal shift and decreased the likelihood by 0.27. This research will facilitate the decision-making and planning for future transportation systems to increase LRT's utility for potential users.

Keywords: Binary Logit Model, Light Rail Transit, Modal Shift, Stated Preference, Travel Behavior.

Received: July 31, 2022; Revised: November 1, 2022; Accepted: December 14, 2022; Prepublished online: January 11, 2023; Published: April 20, 2023  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Abbasi, M., Mamdoohi, A.R., & Arndt, W. (2023). Modal shift behavior of car users to light rail transit, some evidence from the field. Transactions on Transport Sciences14(1), 24-29. doi: 10.5507/tots.2022.021
Download citation

References

  1. Abbasi, M., Hosseinlou, M. H., Sarreshtehdari, A., & Mandzuka, S. (2021). Evaluation of Transit Signal Priority for Bus Rapid Transit in Heterogeneous Traffic Flow. Tehnicki Vjesnik-Technical Gazette, 28(6), 2080-2088. Go to original source...
  2. Abbasi, M., Hosseinlou, M. H., & JafarzadehFadaki, S. (2020). An investigation of Bus Rapid Transit System (BRT) based on economic and air pollution analysis (Tehran, Iran). Case Studies on Transport Policy, 8(2), 553-563. Go to original source...
  3. Abbasi, M., & Hadji Hosseinlou, M. (2022). Assessing Feasibility of overnight-charging electric bus in a real-world BRT system in the context of a developing country. Scientia Iranica.
  4. Abbasi, M., Piccioni, C., Sierpiński, G., & Farzin, I. (2022). Analysis of Crash Severity of Texas Two Lane Rural Roads Using Solar Altitude Angle Based Lighting Condition. Sustainability, 14(3), 1692. Go to original source...
  5. Ahern, A. A., & Tapley, N. (2008). The use of stated preference techniques to model modal choices on interurban trips in Ireland. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 42(1), 15-27. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2007.06.005. Go to original source...
  6. Alberini, A. (2019). Revealed versus Stated Preferences: What Have We Learned About Valuation and Behavior? Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 13(2), 283-298. doi:10.1093/reep/rez010. Go to original source...
  7. Bando, T., Fukuda, D., Wicaksono, A., & Wardani, L. K. (2015). Stated preference analysis for new public transport in a medium-sized Asian city: A case study in Malang, Indonesia. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 11, 1451-1466. doi: 10.11175/easts.11.1451. Go to original source...
  8. Basu, D., & Hunt, J. D. (2012). Valuing of attributes influencing the attractiveness of suburban train service in Mumbai city: A stated preference approach. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46(9), 1465-1476. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2012.05.010. Go to original source...
  9. Ben-Akiva, M., & Morikawa, T. (2002). Comparing ridership attraction of rail and bus. Transport Policy, 9(2), 107-116. doi:10.1016/s0967-070x(02)00009-4. Go to original source...
  10. Bierlaire, M., Axhausen, K., & Abay, G. (2001). The acceptance of modal innovation: The case of Swissmetro. In Swiss Transport Research Conference (No. CONF).
  11. Chatterjee, K. (2011). Modelling the dynamics of bus use in a changing travel environment using panel data. Transportation, 38(3), 487-509. doi:10.1007/s11116-010-9312-y Go to original source...
  12. Christodoulou, A., Raza, Z., & Woxenius, J. (2019). The Integration of RoRo Shipping in Sustainable Intermodal Transport Chains: The Case of a North European RoRo Service. Sustainability, 11(8), 2422. doi:10.3390/su11082422. Go to original source...
  13. Cochran, A. L. (2020). Understanding the role of transportation-related social interaction in travel behavior and health: A qualitative study of adults with disabilities. Journal of Transport & Health, 19, 100948. Go to original source...
  14. de Dios Ortúzar, J., & Willumsen, L. G. (2011). Modelling transport. John wiley & sons.
  15. Domarchi, C., Tudela, A., & González, A. (2008). Effect of attitudes, habit and affective appraisal on mode choice: an application to university workers. Transportation, 35(5), 585-599. doi:10.1007/s11116-008-9168-6. Go to original source...
  16. Engebretsen, Ø., Christiansen, P., & Strand, A. (2017). Bergen light rail - Effects on travel behaviour. Journal of Transport Geography, 62, 111-121. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.05.013. Go to original source...
  17. Guo, Y., Wang, J., Peeta, S., & Anastasopoulos, P. C. (2018). Impacts of internal migration, household registration system, and family planning policy on travel mode choice in China. Travel Behaviour and Society, 13, 128-143. doi:10.1016/j.tbs.2018.07.003. Go to original source...
  18. Hensher, D. A., Balbontin, C., Ho, C. Q., & Mulley, C. (2019). Cross-cultural contrasts of preferences for bus rapid transit and light rail transit. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy (JTEP), 53(1), 47-73.
  19. Hensher, D. A., Rose, J. M., & Greene, W. H. (2005). Applied choice analysis: a primer. Cambridge University Press. Go to original source...
  20. Hensher, D. A., & Rose, J. M. (2007). Development of commuter and non-commuter mode choice models for the assessment of new public transport infrastructure projects: a case study. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 41(5), 428-443. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2006.09.006. Go to original source...
  21. Hensher, D. A., & Rose, J. M. (2007). Development of commuter and non-commuter mode choice models for the assessment of new public transport infrastructure projects: A case study. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 41(5), 428-443. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2006.09.006. Go to original source...
  22. Idris, A. (2013). Modal shift forecasting models for transit service planning (Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto).
  23. Idris, A. O., Habib, K. M. N., & Shalaby, A. (2014). Dissecting the Role of Transit Service Attributes in Attracting Commuters: Lessons from a Comprehensive Revealed Preference-Stated Preference Study on Commuting Mode-Switching Behavior in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Transportation Research Record, 2415(1), 107-117. Go to original source...
  24. Lesley, L. (2008). Sustainable Light Rail. Claverton Conference 24/26th October 2008, https://claverton-energy.com/sustainable-light-rail-2.html.
  25. Mackett, R., & Babalik Sutcliffe, E. (2003). New urban rail systems: a policy-based technique to make them more successful. Journal of Transport Geography, 11(2), 151-164. doi:10.1016/s0966-6923(03)00003-6. Go to original source...
  26. Macioszek, E., Karami, A., Farzin, I., Abbasi, M., Mamdoohi, A. R., & Piccioni, C. (2022). The Effect of Distance Intervals on Walking Likelihood in Different Trip Purposes. Sustainability, 14(6), 3406. Go to original source...
  27. Mattson, J., Peterson, D., Ripplinger, D., Thoms, W., & Hough, J. (2010). An assessment of demand for rural intercity transportation services in a changing environment. Transportation research record, 2145(1), 108-114. doi: 10.3141/2145-13 Go to original source...
  28. Mayo, F. L., & Taboada, E. B. (2020). Ranking factors affecting public transport mode choice of commuters in an urban city of a developing country using analytic hierarchy process: The case of Metro Cebu, Philippines. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 4, 100078. doi:10.1016/j.trip.2019.100078. Go to original source...
  29. Murray, S. J., Walton, D., & Thomas, J. A. (2010). Attitudes towards public transport in New Zealand. Transportation, 37(6), 915-929. doi:10.1007/s11116-010-9303-z. Go to original source...
  30. Outwater, M. L., Spitz, G., Lobb, J., Campbell, M., Sana, B., Pendyala, R., & Woodford, W. (2011). Characteristics of premium transit services that affect mode choice. Transportation, 38(4), 605. doi:10.17226/22401. Go to original source...
  31. Pan, C. (2015). Incorporating Social Interaction Effects into a Travel Mode Choice Behavior Model. In ICTE 2015 (pp. 2622-2629). Go to original source...
  32. Popuri, Y., Proussaloglou, K., Ayvalik, C., Koppelman, F., & Lee, A. (2011). Importance of traveler attitudes in the choice of public transportation to work: findings from the Regional Transportation Authority Attitudinal Survey. Transportation, 38(4), 643-661. doi:10.1007/s11116-011-9336-y. Go to original source...
  33. Ranjbari, A., Chiu, Y.-C., & Hickman, M. (2017). Exploring factors affecting demand for possible future intercity transit options. Public Transport, 9(1-2), 463-481. doi:10.1007/s12469-017-0161-3. Go to original source...
  34. Schramm, L., Watkins, K., & Rutherford, S. (2010). Features that Affect Variability of Travel Time on Bus Rapid Transit Systems. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2143(1), 77-84. doi:10.3141/2143-10. Go to original source...
  35. Sperry, B. R., Burris, M., & Woosnam, K. M. (2017). Investigating the impact of high-speed rail equipment visualization on mode choice models: Case study in central Texas. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 5(4), 560-572. doi:10.1016/j.cstp.2017.10.004. Go to original source...
  36. Train, K. E. (2009). Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge university press.
  37. Van Loon, R., Rietveld, P., & Brons, M. (2011). Travel-time reliability impacts on railway passenger demand: a revealed preference analysis. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(4), 917-925. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.11.009. Go to original source...
  38. Weng, J., Tu, Q., Yuan, R., Lin, P., & Chen, Z. (2018). Modeling Mode Choice Behaviors for Public Transport Commuters in Beijing. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 144(3), 05018013. doi:10.1061/(asce)up.1943-5444.0000459. Go to original source...
  39. Yashiro, R., & Kato, H. (2019). Success factors in the introduction of an intermodal passenger transportation system connecting high-speed rail with intercity bus services. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 7(4), 708-717. doi:10.1016/j.cstp.2019.10.001. Go to original source...
  40. Zhang, J., Fujiwara, A., & Thein, S. (2008). Capturing Travelers' Stated Mode Choice Preferences Under Influence of Income in Yangon City, Myanmar. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 8(4), 49-62. doi: 10.1016/S1570-6672(08)60032-X. Go to original source...
  41. Zheng, Z., Washington, S., Hyland, P., Sloan, K., & Liu, Y. (2016). Preference heterogeneity in mode choice based on a nationwide survey with a focus on urban rail. Transportation research Part A: policy and practice, 91, 178-194. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.