Transactions on Transport Sciences 2020, 11(3):52-62

Advantages and disadvantages of rail transportation as perceived by passengers: A qualitative and quantitative study in the Czech Republic

Martina Trepáčová, Veronika Kurečková, Petr Zámečník, Pavel Řezáč
Centrum dopravního výzkumu, v.v.i., Líšeňská 33a, Brno 636 00, Česká republika

Introduction: Public transport is an important element of sustainable mobility. Rail travel is a traditional mode of transport in the Czech Republic. Its many benefits include positive environmental and safety aspects and the reduction of traffic jams. The choice of transport mode is a complex process involving both rational and irrational motives. More effective promotion of rail transport requires a better understanding of how it is perceived by potential users. This research identifies the key factors perceived as advantages and disadvantages of rail transportation in the Czech Republic.

Methods: In the first phase, an interview framework was constructed and used for in-depth interviews in 35 households using the interpretative phenomenological approach (IPA). These interviews defined the key preferences and barriers for using the train. Data collection was complemented by a quantitative online survey of 405 respondents who rarely used the train.

Results: In the qualitative part of the research, several topics arose from the interviews. Respondents perceive the following aspects as advantages when travelling by train: comfort, the train as a space for social interaction, the view, transportation without worry, and seat reservations. Disadvantages include: crowding, organization of the rail system, low number of trains, delays, train routes, boarding and exiting the train, and luggage transportation. Finances and safety are seen both as advantages and disadvantages of rail travel.

The results of the quantitative part of the research show respondents appreciate that they do not have to pay attention or control the actual process of travelling (n = 232; 57.3%) as compared to using an automobile. They also perceive the ability to move around in the train (n = 153, 37.8%) and the comfort during the journey (n = 152, 37.5%) as advantages. On the other hand they see as disadvantages delays (n = 192, 47.4%), transfers between modes of travel (n = 177, 43.7%) and poor access to some destinations (n = 161, 39.8%).

Conclusions: Travelling is a daily part of many people's lives, and it is desirable to create conditions that simplify this process and make rail transportation accessible to as many passengers as possible across society, whether for individuals, groups, or persons with reduced mobility. This research identified areas that could influence decision-making for the use of rail transportation.

Keywords: Rail transportation; mode choice; advantages; disadvantages; train; barriers; crowding

Received: May 12, 2020; Revised: October 14, 2020; Accepted: October 28, 2020; Prepublished online: November 18, 2020; Published: December 17, 2020  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Trepáčová, M., Kurečková, V., Zámečník, P., & Řezáč, P. (2020). Advantages and disadvantages of rail transportation as perceived by passengers: A qualitative and quantitative study in the Czech Republic. Transactions on Transport Sciences11(3), 52-62
Download citation

References

  1. Accent (2009). Perception towards integrated transport. London: Passenger Focus.
  2. Blainey, S., Hickford, A., & Preston, J. (2012). Barriers to passenger rail use: a review of the evidence. Transport Reviews, 32(6), 675-696. Go to original source...
  3. Cheng, Y. H. (2010). Exploring passenger anxiety associated with train travel. Transportation, 37(6), 875-896. Go to original source...
  4. Cox, T., Houdmont, J., & Griffiths, A. (2006). Rail passenger crowding, stress, health and safety in Britain. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 40(3), 244-258. Go to original source...
  5. Eriksson, L., Friman, M., & Gärling, T. (2008). Stated reasons for reducing work-commute by car. Transportation Research Part F, 11(6), 427-433. Go to original source...
  6. Evans, G. W., & Wener, R. E. (2007). Crowding and personal space invasion on the train: Please don't make me sit in the middle. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(1), 90-94. Go to original source...
  7. Hine, J., & Scott, J. (2000). Seamless, accessible travel: users' views of the public transport journey and interchange. Transport policy, 7(3), 217-226. Go to original source...
  8. Li, Y. W. (2003). Evaluating the urban commute experience: A time perception approach. Journal of Public Transportation, 6(4), 3. Go to original source...
  9. Ljungberg, J. K., & Neely, G. (2007). Stress, subjective experience and cognitive performance during exposure to noise and vibration. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(1), 44-54. Go to original source...
  10. Lynch, G., & Atkins, S. (1988). The influence of personal security fears on women's travel patterns. Transportation, 15(3), 257-277. Go to original source...
  11. Martin, G. L., & Corl, K. G. (1986). System response time effects on user productivity. Behaviour & Information Technology, 5(1), 3-13. Go to original source...
  12. Murray, A. T., Davis, R., Stimson, R. J., & Ferreira, L. (1998). Public transportation access. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 3(5), 319-328. Go to original source...
  13. Novaco, R. W., Stokols, D., Campbell, J., & Stokols, J. (1979). Transportation, stress, and community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 7(4), 361-380. Go to original source...
  14. Řiháček, T., Čermák, I., & Hytych, R. (2013). Kvalitativní analýza textů: čtyři přístupy. Brno: Masarykova univerzita.
  15. Stradling, S., Carreno, M., Rye, T., & Noble, A. (2007). Passenger perceptions and the ideal urban bus journey experience. Transport policy, 14(4), 283-292. Go to original source...
  16. Thum, M., Boucsein, W., Kuhmann, W., & Ray, W. J. (1995). Standardized task strain and system response times in human-computer interaction. Ergonomics, 38(7), 1342-1351. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.