Transactions on Transport Sciences 2020, 11(1):5-17 | DOI: 10.5507/tots.2020.003

Driverless, or Carless Future? Socio-technical Scenarios of Autonomous Urban Mobility in the Czech Republic

Daniel Szabóa
a Transport Research Centre, Lí¹eòská 33a, Brno, Czech republic

The autonomous vehicles are in the phase of prototypes and proofs-of-concept, yet the promises and visions of autonomous future already drive significant changes in long term urban planning. We utilise the socio-technical transition approach to autonomous vehicles' services to help to understand the dynamics of the development and to direct public policies in order to foster a more environmentally and socially sustainable urban mobility. The research uses a three-round Delphi method with experts and stakeholders in the field of research and development to explore potential pathways and develop a multi-level perspective (MLP) socio-technical model of autonomous vehicles' implementation in Czech cities. There already exist stabilising and destabilising pressures within the automobile regimes, closely connected to the autonomous vehicles development, which may result in divergent, more or less disrupting pathways. Considering a varyingly high level of uncertainty in specific regimes, we have developed three diverse socio-technical scenarios: 1. A transformation - 'sceptical-public transport' pathway, barring any significant technological or societal advancements towards autonomous driving in Czech urban context; 2. A reconfiguration - 'slow incremental development' scenario, in which the incremental progress enables more flexible and effective public transport services, shared mobility and promotes electromobility; and 3. A technological substitution - 'techno-optimist' scenario, relying heavily on fast technological progress towards fully autonomous vehicles without requiring vast additional infrastructure and use of V2X communication. Through analysis of the promising niche innovations and their regime-landscape interactions, the article devises a scope for possible policy actions in order to support more sustainable autonomous mobility development.

Keywords: Multi-level Perspective, Socio-technical Transitions, Connected and Autonomous Vehicles, Urban Mobility, Sustainable mobility

Received: August 29, 2019; Accepted: March 27, 2020; Prepublished online: March 27, 2020; Published: May 14, 2020  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Szabó, D. (2020). Driverless, or Carless Future? Socio-technical Scenarios of Autonomous Urban Mobility in the Czech Republic. Transactions on Transport Sciences, 11(1), 5-17. doi: 10.5507/tots.2020.003
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Adam, B., & Groves, C. (2007). Future Matters: Action, Knowledge, Ethics. BRILL.
    2. Altrock, U., Güntner, S., Huning, S., & Peters, D. (2019). Spatial Planning and Urban Development in the New EU Member States - Between Adjustment and Reinvention.
    3. Barr, S., & Prillwitz, J. (2014). A Smarter Choice? Exploring the Behaviour Change Agenda for Environmentally Sustainable Mobility. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 32(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1068/c1201 Go to original source...
    4. Bolton, R., & Foxon, T. J. (2015). A socio-technical perspective on low carbon investment challenges - Insights for UK energy policy. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 14, 165-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2014.07.005 Go to original source...
    5. Castiglione, J., Cooper, D., Sana, B., Tischler, D., Chang, T., Erhardt, G., … Mucci, A. (2018). TNCs & Congestion. Civil Engineering Reports. Retrieved from https://uknowledge.uky.edu/ce_reports/1
    6. Currie, G. (2018). Lies, Damned Lies, AVs, Shared Mobility, and Urban Transit Futures. Journal of Public Transportation, 21, 19-30. https://doi.org/10.5038/2375-0901.21.1.3 Go to original source...
    7. Dennis, K., & Urry, J. (2009). After the Car. Polity.
    8. Docherty, I., Marsden, G., & Anable, J. (2018). The governance of smart mobility. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 115(C), 114-125. Go to original source...
    9. Elzen, B, Geels, F., & Hofman, P. (2002). Sociotechnical Scenarios (STSc): Development and evaluation of a new methodology to explore transitions towards a sustainable energy supply.
    10. Elzen, Boelie, Geels, F. W., & Green, K. (2004). System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability: Theory, Evidence and Policy. Edward Elgar Publishing. Go to original source...
    11. Geels, F. W. (2012a). A socio-technical analysis of low-carbon transitions: Introducing the multi-level perspective into transport studies. Journal of Transport Geography, 24, 471-482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.01.021 Go to original source...
    12. Geels, F. W. (2012b). A socio-technical analysis of low-carbon transitions: Introducing the multi-level perspective into transport studies. Journal of Transport Geography, 24, 471-482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.01.021 Go to original source...
    13. Geels, F. W. (2014). Regime Resistance against Low-Carbon Transitions: Introducing Politics and Power into the Multi-Level Perspective. Theory, Culture & Society, 31(5), 21-40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276414531627 Go to original source...
    14. Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. (2007). Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy, 36(3), 399-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003 Go to original source...
    15. Golub, A., L. Hoffmann, M., E. Lugo, A., & F.Sandoval, G. (2016). Bicycle Justice and Urban Transformation: Biking for all?, 1st Edition (Hardback) - Routledge. Retrieved from https://www.routledge.com/Bicycle-Justice-and-Urban-Transformation-Biking-for-all-1st-Edition/Golub-Hoffmann-Lugo-Sandoval/p/book/9781138950245 Go to original source...
    16. Graham, S., & Marvin, S. (2001). Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition. Psychology Press. Go to original source...
    17. Grush, B., & Niles, J. (2018). The End of Driving: Transportation Systems and Public Policy Planning for Autonomous Vehicles. Elsevier.
    18. Landeta, J., & Barrutia, J. (2011). People consultation to construct the future: A Delphi application. International Journal of Forecasting, 27(1), 134-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2010.04.001 Go to original source...
    19. Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M. (1977). The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Advanced Book Program.
    20. Marres, N. (2018). What if nothing happens? Street trials of intelligent cars as experiments in participation.
    21. Melander, L. (2018). Scenario development in transport studies: Methodological considerations and reflections on delphi studies. Futures, 96, 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2017.11.007 Go to original source...
    22. Nikolaeva, A., Adey, P., Cresswell, T., Lee, J. Y., Nóvoa, A., & Temenos, C. (2019). Commoning mobility: Towards a new politics of mobility transitions. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 44(2), 346-360. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12287 Go to original source...
    23. Nunes, A., & Hernandez, K. D. (2019). Autonomous Vehicles and Public Health: High Cost or High Opportunity Cost?
    24. Roy, S. (2019). QUANTIFYING THE IMPACT OF TRANSPORTATION NETWORK COMPANIES (TNCs) ON TRAFFIC CONGESTION IN SAN FRANCISCO. Theses and Dissertations--Civil Engineering. https://doi.org/10.13023/etd.2019.186 Go to original source...
    25. SAE International. (2018). Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles. https://doi.org/10.4271/J3016_201806 Go to original source...
    26. Sheller, M. (2015). Racialized Mobility Transitions in Philadelphia: Connecting Urban Sustainability and Transport Justice. City & Society, 27(1), 70-91. https://doi.org/10.1111/ciso.12049 Go to original source...
    27. Temenos, C., Nikolaeva, A., Schwanen, T., Cresswell, T., Sengers, F., Watson, M., & Sheller, M. (2017). Theorizing Mobility Transitions: An Interdisciplinary Conversation. Transfers, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.3167/TRANS.2017.070109 Go to original source...
    28. Turoff, M. (1970). The design of a policy Delphi. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2(2), 149-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1625(70)90161-7 Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content